Hi,
The CMake build in Qt 6 uses configure.cmake files that have been
converted from the configure.json files. If you've changed a
configure.cmake file you probably have been asked to change
configure.json too - to keep the content in sync.
This modus operandi is tedious and error-prone.
At
Another +1 and a big thanks to Friedemann for his work on the Windows port over
all the years!
Cheers,
Lars
> On 16 Jun 2021, at 11:18, Morten Sørvig wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well, and I’d like to thank Friedemann for his work on Qt on
> Windows through the years.
>
> Morten
>
>> On 15 Jun
Hi,
I'd like to remind everyone to the fact that the current dependencies
model was intentionally chosen for faster iteration during early Qt 6
development. We _wanted_ to allow breaking things in other modules so
that we could move on. The breakage was to be fixed later, possibly
after
+1 from me as well.
Best regards,
Timur.
From: Development on behalf of Andreas
Buhr
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:06 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Ivan Solovev as approver
+1!
Disclaimer: we work in the same
+1!
Disclaimer: we work in the same team.
On 15.06.21 13:17, Alex Blasche wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Ivan Solovev as an approver for the Qt Project.
Ivan has been working on various parts of the Qt6 port and has regularly
contributed to QtBase modules, QtPositioning, QtNfc & other
Leaving aside the question of what to test when integrating changes to
each given module, I pause to consider how we could sensibly implement
the necessary information for telling automated systems to do that
testing. That may place constraints on what we can do, that might bound
the discussion
+1
Leave reviewing to Ivan you don't even have to run tests.
ti 15. kesäk. 2021 klo 14.19 Alex Blasche (alexander.blas...@qt.io) kirjoitti:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Ivan Solovev as an approver for the Qt Project.
>
> Ivan has been working on various parts of the Qt6 port and has
From: Development On Behalf Of Shawn
Rutledge
Sent: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 10:57 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Solutions for ensuring that changes in upstream
modules are tested with downstream modules before merging
On 2021 Jun 7, at 15:30, Mitch Curtis
+1 from me as well, and I’d like to thank Friedemann for his work on Qt on
Windows through the years.
Morten
> On 15 Jun 2021, at 11:13, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
> Hear hear! +1
>
>> On 15 Jun 2021, at 11:05, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks for the work that all 3 of you have
