Re: [Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress"

Il 28/10/21 17:51, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: That's probably sufficient nagging to the current assignee if they forgot the issue in that state. If it still in progress after that long, they can move it back to In Progress for another 3 months. +1. Thanks, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo |

Re: [Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress"

On Thursday, 28 October 2021 06:44:43 PDT Alex Blasche wrote: > My proposal would be to return every "In Progress" issue to "Open" if there > was no change for 3 month. > > I'd appreciate your feedback. That's probably sufficient nagging to the current assignee if they forgot the issue in that

Re: [Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress"

Hi, Sounds very reasonable. In Progress should communicate that the issue is being somewhat actively worked on. If it hasn’t been touched for 3 months, this clearly (or at least rarely) is not the case. Cheers, David Skoland On 28 Oct 2021, at 15:44, Alex Blasche

Re: [Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress"

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Alex Blasche > Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2021 3:45 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress" > > Hi, > > We have a growing problem with Jira issues forgotten in the "In

[Development] Jira and issues left "In Progress"

Hi, We have a growing problem with Jira issues forgotten in the "In Progress" state. For the 10 most important Jira projects we currently have 600+ issues being stuck in the mentioned state. Since we recognize "In Progress" as a blocking state (not open for take over by other engineers), I

Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver

+1. Best regards, Timur. From: Development on behalf of Lars Knoll Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 11:37 AM To: Volker Hilsheimer Cc: Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver I’ve worked with her a lot on

Re: [Development] Nominating Oliver Eftevaag as Approver

+1 From: Development On Behalf Of Paul Wicking Sent: Wednesday, 27 October 2021 6:25 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Oliver Eftevaag as Approver Hi all, I'd like to nominate Oliver Eftevaag as an approver. Oliver has been working as a software engineer for

Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver

I’ve worked with her a lot on the new Qt Multimedia module for Qt 6 and completely agree with Volker. So +1 from my side :) Cheers, Lars > On 27 Oct 2021, at 11:56, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hello World, > > I’d like to nominate Doris Verria as approver in the Qt Project. > > Doris has

Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver

+1 > On 2021 Oct 28, at 10:14, Jan-Arve Sæther wrote: > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of Volker > Hilsheimer > Sent: onsdag 27. oktober 2021 11:56 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver > > Hello

Re: [Development] Nominating Oliver Eftevaag as Approver

+1 From: Development On Behalf Of Paul Wicking Sent: onsdag 27. oktober 2021 06:25 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Oliver Eftevaag as Approver Hi all, I'd like to nominate Oliver Eftevaag as an approver. Oliver has been working as a software engineer for the

Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver

+1 -Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Volker Hilsheimer Sent: onsdag 27. oktober 2021 11:56 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver Hello World, I’d like to nominate Doris Verria as approver in the Qt Project. Doris has

Re: [Development] QtPositioning and QtLocation split

Thanks for reporting the issues Thiago. Looks like the process for setting up the new repo wasn't fully completed. HEAD now points to dev correctly. Github mirror has been created and replicated. -Daniel From: Development On Behalf Of Ivan Solovev Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 9:49 AM To:

Re: [Development] QtPositioning and QtLocation split

Created https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-4624 Thanks for pointing that out. Best regards, Ivan Solovev Senior Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

On 10/27/21 7:18 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday, 10 September 2021 07:58:55 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: Qt 6 supports using the moc from a different build of Qt, to help with the bootstrapping issue and also so you don't always run a debug-mode moc in your debug builds of Qt. Is that moc