Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

2022-01-20 Thread Timur Pocheptsov
+1 Best regards, Timur. From: Development on behalf of Daniel Smith Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:27 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver +1! I also thought he had been an

Re: [Development] Updating x86 SIMD support in Qt

2022-01-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 20 January 2022 13:10:08 PST Lorn Potter wrote: > well, from https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/simd.html > "also turn on LLVM’s autovectorization passes, so no source > modifications are necessary to benefit from SIMD." > so emscripten's simd support is more than just sse2, sse3,

Re: [Development] Updating x86 SIMD support in Qt

2022-01-20 Thread Lorn Potter
On 21/1/2022 6:10 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Thursday, 20 January 2022 11:22:19 PST Lorn Potter wrote: It's like Jean-Michael says, 32 bit, but it's complicated. Yeah, I can get that :) From what I've understood so far, WASM is not __x86_64__ but it might be __i386__. So far, that's

Re: [Development] Updating x86 SIMD support in Qt

2022-01-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 20 January 2022 11:22:19 PST Lorn Potter wrote: > It's like Jean-Michael says, 32 bit, but it's complicated. Yeah, I can get that :) >From what I've understood so far, WASM is not __x86_64__ but it might be __i386__. So far, that's not a problem. I don't think we use any assembly

Re: [Development] Updating x86 SIMD support in Qt

2022-01-20 Thread Lorn Potter
On 20/1/2022 1:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 20:56:10 PST Lorn Potter wrote: wasm is a special case, as we turn it off by default, regardless of detection. We cannot allow detection by default (specified by some configure argument which is currently -sse2) because

Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

2022-01-20 Thread Daniel Smith
+1! I also thought he had been an approver for quite some time. -Daniel -Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Volker Hilsheimer Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 12:59 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as

[Development] HEADS-UP: call for Qt 6.3 API review

2022-01-20 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, It is time to do a API review for Qt 6.3 now. Diffs are here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:%226.3+API+Review%22 Please do the review asap; we need to compete it as soon as possible. Follow-up task in Jira: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-99883 br, Jani

Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

2022-01-20 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
+1! > On 19 Jan 2022, at 12:59, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like to nominate Dimitrios Apostolou, aka Jimis, as approver in the Qt > Project. > > Jimis has been working as a Software Engineer in the Qt Company since 2019 > and has made a number of contributions [0] and reviews

Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

2022-01-20 Thread Andrei Golubev
+1. Thought he is an approver already. -- Best Regards, Andrei From: Development on behalf of Lars Knoll Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 9:14 AM To: Jukka Jokiniva Cc: Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis"

Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

2022-01-20 Thread Lars Knoll
+1. Lars On 20 Jan 2022, at 07:31, Jukka Jokiniva mailto:jukka.jokin...@qt.io>> wrote: +1 from me too --Jukka From: Development mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org>> on behalf of Oliver Eftevaag mailto:oliver.eftev...@qt.io>> Date: Wednesday, 19. January 2022 at 16.01 To: Mårten