> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Sona > Kurazyan > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 3:44 PM > To: Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io>; development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Qt UDL operators > > [...] > As you can see, https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/401604 raised > a lot of discussion, and not everyone felt comfortable with deprecating (and > later removing) the “q”-prefixed UDLs. > To summarize the discussion, I see following options: > > 1. deprecate _qs, _qba, add Qt::StringLiterals::{_s, _ba}, as suggested > above (https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/401308 + > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/401604) > 2. keep _qs, _qba, add_qL1 and remove Qt::StringLiterals::_L1 > (https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/402948 + > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/402950) > 3. keep _qs, _qba, add _qL1, keep Qt::StringLiterals::_L1, add > Qt::StringLiterals::{_s, _ba} > (https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/402948 + > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/401308) > > I personally prefer the 1st option, but it would be nice to hear more > opinions/concerns and decide how to proceed.
If you use the "Qt Quick Application" wizard in any recent Qt Creator, and selected a Qt 6 version as minimally required version, the generated main.cpp code will contain code like const QUrl url(u"qrc:/myproject/main.qml"_qs); Deprecating the u""_qs will mean that we break the most basic user 'hello world' projects utilizing this wizard. I therefore think it's too late to deprecate u""_qs any time soon. My 2 cents, Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
