Re: [Development] Qt UDL operators

Hi, Il 04/04/22 15:53, Sona Kurazyan ha scritto: I see two main issues with keeping both: - If we want to add UDLs with same names for different domains in future, adding the "q"-prefixed counterparts will be problematic. For example, let's say we want to add Qt::inline Literals::inline

Re: [Development] Qt UDL operators

I see two main issues with keeping both: - If we want to add UDLs with same names for different domains in future, adding the "q"-prefixed counterparts will be problematic. For example, let's say we want to add Qt::inline Literals::inline OtherDomain::_s, what should be the "q"-prefixed

Re: [Development] Qt UDL operators

Il 30/03/22 15:44, Sona Kurazyan ha scritto: # keep _qs, _qba, add _qL1, keep Qt::StringLiterals::_L1, add Qt::StringLiterals::{_s, _ba} (https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/402948 +

Re: [Development] Qt UDL operators

Following Thiago's advice, updated https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/401604/ to enable the warning only after N+4 minor release of Qt (i.e. 6.8). That should give more time for updating the existing code. Best regards, Sona > -Original Message- > From: Development On

[Development] Moving qthttpserver from qt-extensions to qt5

Hi, I'd like to move the QtHttpServer module from it current place in qt- extensions [1] to the qt5 hierarchy as a preview module. This would make it easier for users to use the module, especially with other Qt versions than "dev". The plan is to make QtHttpServer a normal qt module once it's