On Tuesday 12 June 2018 00:41:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 11 June 2018 22:50:09 CEST Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> > Would it also make sense to explore msgpack? https://msgpack.org/
>
> No. Msgpack is the older version of CBOR, which we already have.
CBOR is IMHO better than Message
On Sunday 14 January 2018 17:49:48 Adrien LERAVAT wrote:
> In that case, the QCoapReply life is managed with a
> QSharedPointer in the request.
>
> QCoapRequest does not inherit from QObject. Anyone sees a problem with this
> approach?
The API sounds interesting, but it's a departure of what we
On Saturday 02 December 2017 19:11:23 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > And, c'mon, std::optional's API is just not going to be topped by
> > > QOptional. What should they do? snake_case vs. camelCase? That's what
> > > we need to invest several man-days of development work in, to rename
> > > the
