Re: [Development] QThread usage/guidance

Op 7 okt. 2012 om 02:20 heeft Sze Howe Koh het volgende geschreven: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 6 October 2012 16:46, Kevin Krammer wrote: > > > > Because it clearly states that QTcpSocket instances returned by that method > > cannot be used from another t

Re: [Development] bool QProcess::waitForFinished() Race Condition?

Op 26-9-2012 9:32, d3fault schreef: > I don't have a git clone and gerrit set up atm otherwise I'd submit > it. Can someone else do it for me? Well, this sounds like a fine time to get such a setup then? > And another semi-OT question relating to documentation: how are we > synchronizing wiki edits

Re: [Development] Fwd: Re: Proposing QSqlQuery syntax sugar

Op 19-9-2012 11:32, Andras Mantia schreef: > Thiago A. Corrêa wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>I'd like to propose a templated QSqlQuery::value in the same way >> QVariant::value works. This syntax suggar allows one to write: >> >>QSqlQuery query; >>... >>int myvalue = query.val

Re: [Development] Qt wiki MinGW for 64 bit

Op 14-9-2012 11:55, niXman schreef: > Hello, > > Today, reading this(qt-project.org/wiki/MinGW-64-bit) note, I paid > attention to the fact that it refers to the need to edit qmake.conf > Qt5 for building 64-bit. > But yesterday, I have built Qt5 for 64-bit successfully without > changing qmake.con

Re: [Development] Removing Wacom support in Qt5

Op 10-9-2012 15:45, Boudewijn Rempt schreef: > I mean, there clearly are more important users of Wacom support in Qt than me > with Krita. Don't underestimate yourself ;-) André ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-pro

Re: [Development] Removing Wacom support in Qt5

Op 6-9-2012 9:41, Boudewijn Rempt schreef: > For me as an application developer, I wonder what the alternative > would be. I guess to write two platform specific event handlers myself > (win and X11, I cannot afford a Mac) and synthesize the > QTabletEvents... Do a fund raiser to get me some dif

Re: [Development] Idea: a qt-project subdomain for QML snippets

I don't quite see what this adds to the wiki that already has a snippets section. André Op 11 aug. 2012 om 00:27 heeft Mark het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > Every once in a while you encounter some nice QML snippet which helps > you out, but will perhaps help others out as well if they jus

Re: [Development] Two bugs in the QIcon which broke my life.

Op 8-8-2012 10:49, Stephen Kelly schreef: On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:35:15 André Somers wrote: > Op 8-8-2012 10:30, Stephen Kelly schreef: > > On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:03:34 ? ??? wrote: > > > In the QIcon/QIconLoader there are 2 old

Re: [Development] Two bugs in the QIcon which broke my life.

Op 8-8-2012 10:30, Stephen Kelly schreef: On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:03:34 ? ??? wrote: > In the QIcon/QIconLoader there are 2 old bugs with patches. > > - https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-17953 > - https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-12874 > > >

Re: [Development] state of Qt's Australia office

Op 1-8-2012 5:00, lorn.pot...@nokia.com schreef: > Hi all, > > We have received word that the Brisbane Australia office, consisting of the > teams working on Qt3D, QtDeclarative, QtMultimedia, QtSensors, and QtSystems > modules, as well as the CI/QA team for Qt, will be shut down. Our last day is

Re: [Development] State of the Qt Solutions Archive

Op 13-7-2012 15:29, Thiago Macieira schreef: > On sexta-feira, 13 de julho de 2012 14.33.18, Lukas Geyer wrote: >> I've fixed QtSingleApplication for Qt5 and created a merge request, just >> to find out that it's quite quiet there, with merge request beeing not >> seen (?) or at least discussed and

Re: [Development] Why don't we have notify signal for all of the properties?

Op 6-7-2012 13:30, Olivier Goffart schreef: > On Friday 06 July 2012 13:02:16 André Somers wrote: >> Op 6-7-2012 12:45, Tr3wory schreef: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I found the QML's property binding system really powerful, but as far >>> as I understand

Re: [Development] Why don't we have notify signal for all of the properties?

Op 6-7-2012 12:45, Tr3wory schreef: > Hi all! > > I found the QML's property binding system really powerful, but as far > as I understand on the C++ side it relies on the property's NOTIFY > signal. > I know the notify signal is added around Qt 4.6, and as far as I > understand we couldn't add more

Re: [Development] Abandoning the container changes

Op 5-7-2012 12:28, Thiago Macieira schreef: > We can add them, but I don't see a value in doing that if no one is using > them. They'll just increase build time. How could we use it, if it is not included? André ___ Development mailing list Development@

Re: [Development] Proposal: Remove QML from Qt's code base (OR: Should it be a requirement that Qt Modules are interoperable?)

Op 4-7-2012 11:00, d3fault schreef: On Jul 4, 2012 1:18 AM, "Attila Csipa" > wrote: > >>replacement. There is no C++ equivalent of much of the functionality > > in QML, whereas everything you can do in a .ui file, you can do in C++. > > > > This is a bit of a red herr

Re: [Development] Move QAction from QtWidgets to QtGui

Op 3-7-2012 18:31, Tomasz Siekierda schreef: > Hi, > > just a quick note regarding this: > >> Would it not be possible to split QAction in two classes, just like > QApplication was split? We could perhaps create a QCoreAction > > I think a better name would be QSimpleAction. Runs off the tongue a >

Re: [Development] Move QAction from QtWidgets to QtGui

Op 3-7-2012 18:45, simon.hausm...@nokia.com schreef: > I'm not a fan of moving QAction back to QtGui, because there it would be a > class that cannot be used by itself. Out of the box it is only useful with > the containers in QtWidgets. Why could it not be used by itself? I would totally use it

Re: [Development] Move QAction from QtWidgets to QtGui

Op 3-7-2012 15:07, Shawn Rutledge schreef: > On Tuesday wk27 2012 July 03 09:36:26 AM ext Anselmo L. S. Melo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 07/03/2012 05:06 AM, Davide Bettio wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've noticed that QAction hasn't been moved from QtWidgets module to >>> QtGui module, it would be really

Re: [Development] Becoming a Tier 1 platform and the CI System

Op 7-6-2012 13:28, Peter Kümmel schreef: > On 07.06.2012 08:35, Rohan McGovern wrote: >> Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said: It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So, if you need to

Re: [Development] Approver status

Op 25-5-2012 11:53, Sylvain Pointeau schreef: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Laszlo Papp > wrote: > I think that defining fixed number of LOC or hours spend on > the project is not going to work. Please don't go there. I fully agree. I can understand th

Re: [Development] Approver status

Op 25-5-2012 9:34, André Somers schreef: > Hi, > > Op 25-5-2012 8:27, lars.kn...@nokia.com schreef: >> I agree with Andre. Currently we do not have any guiding criteria in >> place, so it's probably difficult to judge when someone is ready to be >> nominated as a

Re: [Development] Approver status

Hi, Op 25-5-2012 8:27, lars.kn...@nokia.com schreef: > I agree with Andre. Currently we do not have any guiding criteria in > place, so it's probably difficult to judge when someone is ready to be > nominated as an approver. We've now had one or two cases where people > where being nominated a bi

Re: [Development] Proposal: Change Qt Slogan

Op 22-5-2012 10:53, d3fault schreef: > I think we need a slogan change so as not to lie to our users. Could you please stop trolling now? This is not constructive anymore. Your comments have been heard, judging by the amount of people who responded in your many topics in this list, the forum and

Re: [Development] looking for chart examples

Op 21-5-2012 22:56, Purdy, Edgar schreef: Are there any examples on line for implementing the qt chart widget?I need to implement 15 charts on a single panel. I think you should ask your question in the inter...@qt-project.org mailinglist instead. This ML is about developing Qt *itself*

Re: [Development] The place of QML

Op 16-5-2012 1:31, André Pönitz schreef: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:13:19AM -0700, BRM wrote: >>> From: Donald Carr >>> [...] This is out of a sample set of 110 people, which is >>> infinitesimally small in comparison to the Qt user base. It would >>> be a stretch to call this a statistically si

Re: [Development] #qt-labs IRC channel on irc.freenode.net

Op 14-5-2012 17:26, Carl Schumann schreef: > Qt developers, > > I am struggling to access the #qt-labs IRC channel on > irc.freenode.net. I am on a Windows Machine. Any recommendations for > a Windows IRC client please? Thanks for any help. > > Sincerely, > Carl Schumann > I use Quassel IRC,

Re: [Development] The place of QML

Op 19-4-2012 8:18, Robin Burchell schreef: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan > wrote: >> As for a blog, why is there no qt-project blog? It would be great to >> have people blogging about Qt development related stuff. > presumably because it's a bit hard to define who gets ac

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta: Documentation

Op 12-4-2012 15:12, casper.vandonde...@nokia.com schreef: > Modularizing the documentation is a process that will move a lot of files > around and make some things impossible. > The biggest consequence will be that we will have the same dependency > chain as when compiling the modules. > E.g. not a

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

Op 19-3-2012 10:42, Thiago Macieira schreef: > They shouldn't rely on that at all. The documentation of QHash says > that it produces an arbitrary but stable[1] order. > [1] note that the order is stable. Two hashing tables with the same > elements must produce the same order. If I understood

Re: [Development] need to handle touch events rather than depending on mouse event synthesis

While I find this dicussion interesting, I am wondering about the relation with the Qt 5 feature freeze that has gone by a few weeks ago, and Lars' email about that on february 22 ("Important: Qt 5 freeze"). Do you think it is possible to tackle this in 5.1, or does it need binary or even sourc

Re: [Development] Changing qreal to a float

Op 21-2-2012 9:35, Thiago Macieira schreef: > On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 08.24.52, Samuel Rødal wrote: >> Also, I guess we'll want convenience functions "QRectD QRectF::toRectD() >> const" etc. Can that be done with the typedefs proposed above, or does >> it require having "QRectD QRec

Re: [Development] Another feature request for qdoc - multilanguage support

Hi, Op 2/17/2012 7:22 AM, liang...@nokia.com schreef: > Hi, all, > > Not every developer is good at English. Many of them would like to see the > documentation in their own language. > > David Boddie had done some work before, under qtdoc/doc/src, there are ja_JP > and zh_CN directories. For sep

Re: [Development] QML engine C++ class renaming

Op 2/15/2012 11:21 AM, Mark schreef: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Robin Burchell mailto:robin%2...@viroteck.net>> wrote: 2012/2/15 Mark mailto:mark...@gmail.com>>: > Why would you still support QML 1? Qt5 is going to have QML 2 which should > be superior to QML 1 in about e

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

Op 2/10/2012 2:15 PM, casper.vandonde...@nokia.com schreef: > On 2/10/12 8:07 AM, "ext Andre Somers" wrote: > >> Op 9-2-2012 19:13, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com schreef: >>> On 09/02/2012 10:33, ext Manuel Nickschas wrote: On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:36:09 ext Olivier Goffart wrote: >

Re: [Development] QMetaTypeId and QMetaTypeId2

Op 9-2-2012 12:39, Stephen Kelly schreef: > Can I merge QMetaTypeId and QMetaTypeId2? I always thought they were split so that Qt could add new built-in metatypes without breaking user code. Eg, if you merge them, any user code doing: Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(QModelIndex) will no longer compile

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

Op 2-2-2012 13:22, David Faure schreef: > On Thursday 02 February 2012 12:52:38 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Somers wrote: >> I think there are plenty of implementations doing this already. Take a >> look at QxtLogger for instance. It can be used with the output handler >> just fine, but it also allows

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

Op 2-2-2012 0:03, BRM schreef: >> From: David Faure >> On Wednesday 01 February 2012 10:02:00 BRM wrote: >>> I would also suggest that the plugins use a standard public interface >>> class >>> such as QAbstractLogFacility, like QTcpSocket uses QAbstractSocket - so >>> that people can add the

Re: [Development] Work on qDebug and friends

Op 25-1-2012 8:33, kai.koe...@nokia.com schreef: > True. As much as I think a logging framework under the Qt project > umbrella would be useful, there'll be also always projects who want to > implement their own one. But ideally they should be able to do this on > the common infrastructure in Qt

Re: [Development] Nominating Robin Burchell for approver

Op 19-1-2012 13:12, lars.kn...@nokia.com schreef: > The approval period has passed, and Robin has now gotten Approver status > today. > > Congratulations Robin! > Congrats indeed, well deserved! André ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.o

Re: [Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > > Le Nov 9, 2011 à 10:14 AM, André Somers a écrit : > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > >> On 11/08/2011 10:57 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 8 de November

Re: [Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > On 11/08/2011 10:57 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Tuesday, 8 de November de 2011 19:40:13 Jeremy Lainé wrote: > >> - the QNAM-style API seems to be OK > > Correct, but all functions in QDnsResolver are static. > > > > That means they could

Re: [Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > Based on some initial feedback I received regarding DNS SRV support in Qt, > I have refactored my proposed code and introduced a "QDnsResolver" class > which I would like to submit for API review. The point of this class is to > provide a QNA

Re: [Development] Long time before becoming approver?

Hi, Frankly, I don't really get this discussion. What is the rush exactly in appointing approvers? Why is there is need to speed up the appointment procedure? We have /just/ started working with the open governance model. I would suggest we first try it out in its current form for a while before

Re: [Development] QTBUG-10481: Adding support for DNS SRV lookups

Hi, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > > > While we are on the topic of the API, one thing which needs to be adressed > is the kind of > "handle" (if any) we return for asynchronous lookups: > > - QHostInfo::lookupHost() returns an integer > - QDnsServiceInfo::lookupService()

<    1   2   3   4