Re: [Development] androiddeployqt - how it works or should work?

ry hard to find/parse but it would cover the "most common cases". Thank you again! Felipe On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt < eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2013 07:01 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > > I understand androidde

[Development] androiddeployqt - how it works or should work?

I understand androiddeployqt is supposed to separate the "deployment" from qt but to be honest so far it seems to be harder than before - probably because I just don't know how is supposed to work. Before you would have all the "android files" added to your project and could control them with the

[Development] Qt5 regression with PathView (or I am missing something?)

I just filled a bug report ( https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34520) but since I am seeing other cases where my application crashes due to ASSERT statements on the scenegraph\coreapi\qsgbatchrenderer.cpp I started wondering if I am missing something. On my bug report you will find tw

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Beta - is it really much slower to parse qml/javascript on android?

sets all the time which > seems > > expensive. > > > > I haven't tried it since 5.1 but if it is not fixed its very likely the > > cause > > of your problem. > > > > Björn > > Am Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2013, 07:07:41 schrieb Koehne Kai: > > &g

[Development] Qt 5.2 Beta - is it really much slower to parse qml/javascript on android?

summary: some very simple "qml" code now is taking 4 seconds to "parse" and get to the "component.onCompleted" on android. It is instantaneous using qml 1.0/old necessitas. What is the best way to profile and found why? Anybody seeing a much longer "parsing time"? can it be related to the replaceme

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

BogDan: Thank you for all your work and this explanation! I was afraid that, at least part of, the reasoning for Ministro was the create/control a "shared location" :( Do you have any ideas of how we could continue with "shared libraries" (not per app) but avoid having to install ministro "manual

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

nd. Note that I am only talking about "the Qt shared libraries" - not any other third party libraries. just my 2ct. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt < eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com> wrote: > On 01/11/2013 03:36 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote:

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > >> I have to assume this subject has been discussed before in other lists >> but since the android port it is a "hot topic" on this list right now I >> thought it was worth starting again. > > &

[Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

I have to assume this subject has been discussed before in other lists but since the android port it is a "hot topic" on this list right now I thought it was worth starting again. I deployed a test application using the necessitas project and while I was impressed on how nice the development exper

[Development] I know this is the wrong place but: qt-project.org is down

This is the message I get when I try to access it: Site Error: Unable to Load Site Preferences; No Preferences Found Sorry for sending to this list but figured out someone here would know what to do about it. Felipe ___ Development mailing list Develop