Hi all,
I also want to backup these thoughts - even though our company has no cards in
the qt3d play, we had the same impact by being hit from abandoning QtWebKit
(in a minor release!!!) and QScriptEngine. Every product with a lifetime of
decades gets shaken in its foundations from such decisio
On Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2021 17:51:51 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 May 2021 08:30:52 PDT Frank Hemer wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2021 17:26:50 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Even maintainers who like me don't get access to the source, it's
>
On Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2021 17:26:50 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 May 2021 06:33:07 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> > Most of the maintainers are also addressing issues in the commercial LTS
> > releases, including also some who do not work for The Qt Company. So in
> > that sense it is
On Monday 20 March 2017 16:40:07 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Development
> [mailto:development-bounces+scott=towel42@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Konrad Rosenbaum Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 07:57
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development]
On Tuesday 19 July 2016 11:57:20 Prav wrote:
> Hello, Everyone!
>
> > The scope of this is the Qt::AA_EnanbleHighDpiScaling mode. I’d like to
> >
> > focus on two aspects:
> > 1) Automatic scale factor configuration based on system settings.
>
> There so many debates about this topic and how
Hi Morten,
On Friday 17 June 2016 12:06:06 Morten Sorvig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After shipping the high-dpi update in 5.6 we’ve gotten several reports
> that application scaling does not always come out as intended (see
> QTBUG-52318, QTBUG-53416, QTBUG-53500, and QTBUG-54144). I’d like to
> take a
On Friday 08 May 2015 14:32:43 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’ve just looked a bit at the QtXmlPatterns module. The module has a few
> issues and is not actively maintained. I wonder if it should see
> improvements or if there are good alternatives which might be more spec
> compliant
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:59:11 André Somers wrote:
> Knoll Lars schreef op 3-2-2015 om 10:51:
> > So Qt 5.6 can drop mingw support?
> > There are currently no plans in dropping mingw. But webengine is currently
> > not supported on that compiler.
>
> So I guess that does mean that it will n
On Sunday 27 April 2014 12:55:58 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of
> QML for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui
> nobody would have complained.
+1
Frank
___
Deve
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 04:46:43 joao morgado wrote:
> I really don't understand why QtWidgets are not suitable for mobile
> plataforms. What is the technicall reason ? Following the Qt "code once
> deploy everywhere" I have apps with pratically the same code for desktop,
> symbian and Blackberr
On Friday 25 January 2013 23:15:57 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> On 25 January 2013 23:04, Frank Hemer wrote:
> > > 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA:
> > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/
> >
> > What about those >200 reports against 5.0.0 that sti
On Friday 25 January 2013 14:44:26 Motyka Rafal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Qt 5.0.1 RC release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask
> the Qt Community for help by testing the new packages.
>
> 1. Installer packages are available here:
> http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5/5.0.1-rc1/
>
On Monday 15 October 2012 18:35:01 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 15 October 2012 15:56:23 Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
> > The main focus of Qt on the desktop is to provide a native look and feel
> > on
> > all platforms. Until now, Qt has come bundled with a few extra styles that
> > were
On Sunday 09 September 2012 11:19:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 9 de setembro de 2012 10.55.10, Frank Hemer wrote:
> > > Note that this also applies for Qt 4.8. If the support is broken there
> > > and
> > > causing issues like Ariel is describing, i
On Sunday 09 September 2012 09:25:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sábado, 8 de setembro de 2012 21.25.21, Ariel Molina R. wrote:
> > > 3. So, you propose to remove tablet support in Qt 5.
> >
> > I proposed on the IRC channel two options and a third one appeared:
> > 1) Qt::WA_AcceptWacom flag, to
On Thursday 06 September 2012 09:03:56 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2012 08.53.11, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > Another point to consider:
> > >
> > > 1) Quick 2.0 is the way to go, but it targets designers
> > > 2) Designers use mostly Adobe suite and other similar t
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 13:18:26 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 5/8/12 12:08 PM, "ext Frank Hemer" wrote:
> >On Tuesday 08 May 2012 09:50:16 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> >> > > Now we suddenly have an easy to use, yet compulsory, Turing complete
> >> > &
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 09:50:16 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > > Now we suddenly have an easy to use, yet compulsory, Turing complete
> > > language with essentially no support from off-the-shelf tools.
> >
> > It's this "compulsory" part that I don't understand.
> > The current situation is that if you
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 04:13:40 Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012 07:44:56 ext André Pönitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:35:02AM +, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > > [...] And who says that 100% of the code has to be C++?
> >
> > Nobody reasonably wants that. But people like to h
19 matches
Mail list logo
