If you say not to differentiate empty and null states, some questions arise:
1) Why we have isNull and isEmpty at the same time?
2) Why their implementations are different?
3) What would be the advice on what to use in general: isNull of isEmpty?
Jarek
Actually, some of the i18n features of Qt _requires_ you to provide an
English translation.
This is the case for the plural forms, where the engineer typically writes.
tr(Found %n item(s), 0, m_numberOfItemsFound);
And Qt will pick the singular/plural translation (that came from the
___
From: Keith Gardner [kreios4...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 July 2014 14:34
To: Kobus Jaroslaw
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Adding support for version number comparisons
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Kobus Jaroslaw
Hi All,
With the current state of QVersion (patchset 35) I see the following issues:
1. operator() doesn't take the suffix into account (mentioned below)
2. There is no handling of sub version (you cannot differentiate 5.0.0, 5.0 and
5 - they are all equal)
The idea which could resolve these
Just looking at the topic of that thread, I suggest to name it: QVersionNubmer.
QVersion may suggest some more, like description of the version or provide an
info about different set of features.
From:
