I am really confused by this thread.
If I read Jani's mail correctly, the plan is:
Keep everything as it is, except for adding Qt3D to the installers?
Or more exaggerated:
Keep everything as it is, except for the official endorsement.
Or even more exaggerated:
Keep everything as
Am 21.02.2024 um 20:28 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 10:56:49 PST Edward Welbourne via Development
wrote:
(Incidentally, the ways I can think of to say "has no name" tend to
suffer from some degree of precedent as "has a name but it has not been
disclosed" - the
Am 21.02.2024 um 17:36 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 08:26:52 PST Jøger Hansegård via Development
wrote:
Our Qt coding conventions (https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) has a
statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as I
understand, this
Am 16.12.2023 um 09:21 schrieb apoenitz:
I haven't tried yet, but I have the gut feeling that one should be able
to get away with
Seems your gut feeling is right. Did a little experiment[1], and ended
up with this:
class MyObject :public Object
{
M_OBJECT
public:
using
Hi,
would QDirIterator[1] be part of this deprecation? Its API clearly seems
be inspired by the Java-style iterators.
While I do not care much about the other Java-style iterators, I really
like this iterator and use it a lot.
What would be this iterator's modern replacement in Qt?
Ciao
