Re: [Development] Nominating Matthias Rauter for approval status

+1 :) On Jan 30, 2024, at 13:11, Paul Tvete via Development wrote: Hi, I would like to nominate Matthias Rauter as an approver for the Qt Project. Matthias has been working on Qt for more than a year now. In this time, he has done great work on Qt Location and Qt SVG, among other. I have

[Development] Nominating Jaishree Vyas as approver

Hi everyone, I would like to nominate Jaishree Vyas for approver rights in the Qt project. Jai has joined TQtC as a Documentation Engineer back in February 2022. Since then, she's been actively making and reviewing changes. I fully trust Jai's judgment in reviewing and approving changes, and

Re: [Development] Lots of qdoc-related warning messages when building 'docs' target in Qt-6.6.0?

On 22 Oct 2023, at 05:21, Haowei Hsu wrote: Hello, Paul. Hi! I've read https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qdoc-warnings.html, but still don't figure it out. BTW, I also tried to build docs of Qt-6.5.3, and still encountered the same problem. For example: [snip] You can see the full logs in

Re: [Development] Lots of qdoc-related warning messages when building 'docs' target in Qt-6.6.0?

On 21 Oct 2023, at 11:20, Haowei Hsu wrote: Hello, Volker. To resolve those, make patches to gerrit that fix them :) Do you mean that it is actually a bug? A warning from QDoc indicates that there's an issue in the documentation. The QDoc manual describes how you can go about to resolve

Re: [Development] How to document API only deprecated in future Qt versions

On 15 Sep 2023, at 10:44, Edward Welbourne via Development wrote: On 9/15/23 09:36, Kai Köhne via Development wrote: The methods are formally marked as deprecated for Qt 6.10. But the methods are already in the '-obsolete' page for Qt 6.6, which leaves the API in a weird in-between state.

Re: [Development] Proposal: (re)move qt5.git/_clang-format

On 13 Sep 2023, at 16:25, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: I find the input from clang-format’s sometimes helpful, sometimes annoying. And the source of the annoyance is not that clang-format points out things that I could have formatted differently, but that our pre-commit hook

Re: [Development] Proposal: (re)move qt5.git/_clang-format

On 12 Sep 2023, at 22:33, Ahmad Samir wrote: _clang-format isn't picked up by clang-format by default, you'd have to rename it to .clang-format. clang-format reads either of them [0]. It's unnecessary to rename the configuration file. [0] -

Re: [Development] BC/SC in patch releases (particularly enum additions)

On 23 Aug 2023, at 15:39, Marc Mutz via Development wrote: Hi, I cannot find Eddy's email in between, In case you're still looking for it: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2023-August/044348.html //! Paul -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

> On 20 Aug 2023, at 20:36, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > The top-level build is finicky and only supported as a convenience. It breaks > often because it's not what the CI uses. Please compile and build each module > only, unless you plan on helping fix those issues. So my suggestion is that

Re: [Development] Nominating Santhosh Kumar Selvaraj for approver rights

+1 :) > On 21 Jun 2023, at 03:24, EXT Mitch Curtis via Development > wrote: > > +1 > >> -Original Message- >> From: Development On Behalf Of >> Jan-Arve Sæther via Development >> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:56 AM >> To: Jack Simcox via Development >> Subject: [Development]

Re: [Development] Nominating Konrad Kujawa as approver

+1 On 24 May 2023, at 13:03, Mårten Nordheim via Development wrote: +1 :) Also same team Mårten From: Development mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org>> on behalf of Ievgenii Meshcheriakov via Development mailto:development@qt-project.org>>

Re: [Development] Nominating Tinja Paavoseppä as an approver for the Qt Project

+1 Changes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:tinja.paavoseppa%2540qt.io Reviews: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:tinja.paavoseppa%2540qt.io On 21 Mar 2023, at 08:50, Nicholas Bennett via Development wrote: Hi all, I'd like to nominate Tinja Paavoseppä as an approver for

Re: [Development] Nominating Mats Honkamaa as an approver for the Qt Project

+1 Mats is an excellent technical writer, and has previously contributed to both Qt 3D and Qt Creator. He also provides useful feedback and suggestions as part of his reviews (see list at https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:mats.honkamaa%2540qt.io). (I have to admit I am absolutely

Re: [Development] Nominating Mikołaj Boć as approver

+1 On 21 Dec 2022, at 15:42, Morten Sørvig via Development wrote: Hello again, Correct links to gerrit should be: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:Mikolaj.Boc%2540qt.io

Re: [Development] How to modify the "Full Name" of Jira?

Hi, get in touch with jira-ad...@qt-project.org for these types of requests. Cheers, Paul On 21 Dec 2022, at 03:28, JiDe Zhang wrote: Hi, My account of Jira is "zccrs", I want to modify my "Full Name" to "JiDe Zhang", but I can't find an edit button for it.

Re: [Development] Nominating Axel Spoerl as approver

+ 1 Couldn't be happier to back this nomination up. I'm impressed at how Axel never misses a chance to step up and help his colleagues if he can. His mentality reminds me of what Pippi Longstocking says – "I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that" – and

Re: [Development] New Chief Maintainer

Thank you for your invaluable contribution in the role as Chief Maintainer over the years, Lars! Regarding the way forward; I agree with André Somers that lazy consensus will not do, the QUIP explicitly requires a vote. I also agree that objecting to a candidate shouldn't require one to also

Re: [Development] Nominating David Skoland as approver

+1. From: Development on behalf of Morten Sørvig Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 14:00 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating David Skoland as approver I'd like to nominate David Skoland as approver for the Qt Project. David

[Development] Nominating Luca Di Sera as approver

Hi, I'd like to nominate Luca Di Sera as approver in the Qt Project. Luca joined The Qt Company as a Software Engineer six months ago. His contributions [0] and reviews [1] are steady and of high quality. Some of his contributions are in TQtC internal repositories. I particularly appreciate

Re: [Development] Nominating Dimitrios "Jimis" Apostolou as Approver

+1! //! Paul > On 19 Jan 2022, at 12:59, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like to nominate Dimitrios Apostolou, aka Jimis, as approver in the Qt > Project. > > Jimis has been working as a Software Engineer in the Qt Company since 2019 > and has made a number of contributions [0]

Re: [Development] Documentation of new Qt features in qtdoc

> On 19 Nov 2021, at 16:11, Kai Köhne wrote: > > Hi, > > Can we agree to document new features in Qt 6.3 and following released > directly in qtdoc.git? > > We have traditionally been using wiki.qt.io to collect new features in a Qt > release, see for instance

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Qt 6.3 Feature Freeze is getting closer...

On 10 Nov 2021, at 11:42, Jani Heikkinen mailto:jani.heikki...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi all, Just a kindly reminder: Qt 6.3.0 Feature Freeze will be in effect 10th December 2021 so there is a month left for implementing new features, modules etc for Qt 6.3 It is also time to start listing new

Re: [Development] Nominating Doris Verria as Approver

+1 > On 27 Oct 2021, at 11:56, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hello World, > > I’d like to nominate Doris Verria as approver in the Qt Project. > > Doris has been working as a Software Engineer for The Qt Company for over a > year, and has made great contributions to Qt [0]. I have come to

[Development] Nominating Oliver Eftevaag as Approver

Hi all, I'd like to nominate Oliver Eftevaag as an approver. Oliver has been working as a software engineer for the Qt Company for almost a year now and has made a fair number of contributions to Qt [0]. He also participates actively in reviews [1]. He's curious and passionate about learning

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

> On 5 Oct 2021, at 08:45, Nicholas Bennett wrote: > > Lars, > Couple of questions: > Who is eligible to vote? This is defined in QUIP-2 [0] (the governance model) and depends on what the vote is about. My understanding is that matters that are about maintainer(s)/maintainership can only

[Development] Nominating Nicholas Bennett as Approver

Hi all, I’d like to nominate Nicholas Bennett as approver for the Qt Project. Nicholas has been working with Qt since he joined the Qt Company as a Documentation Engineer at the start of the year. He does stellar work, in my opinion, both with his own changes [0] and as a reviewer [1]. I

Re: [Development] Nominating Craig Scott as approver

+ 1 Disclaimer: Reviewing Craig’s documentation patches always makes me happy, as he aims for excellence. //! Paul > On 10 Aug 2021, at 09:13, Joerg Bornemann wrote: > > Hi there! > > I'd like to nominate Craig Scott as approver. > > Craig, whom you might know as CMake co-maintainer and

Re: [Development] Mirror IRC channels on KDE's Matrix Instance

On 6/28/21 12:51 PM, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Context > --- > > After the "Improve the contributor experience" session at the past Qt > Contributors Summit, many ideas came out related to an overall > improvement to the contribution experience, mainly focused on

[Development] PSA: QDoc's \deprecated command is better since Qt 6.2

Hi all, The following is a quick update from us documentation folks: If something is deprecated, use \deprecated in documentation, not \obsolete. QDoc now lets you record the version something is deprecated and suggest replacements with the \deprecated command. These descriptions become the

Re: [Development] Nominating Johanna Vanhatapio as an approver

On 5/20/21 12:04 PM, Paul Wicking wrote: > I’ve received emails through development@ from both Topi and Leena seconding > the motion. > ...and those are in the archives, as well: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2021-April/041242.html //! Paul > //! Paul > &g

Re: [Development] Nominating Johanna Vanhatapio as an approver

I’ve received emails through development@ from both Topi and Leena seconding the motion. //! Paul > On 20 May 2021, at 11:51, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > wrote: > > On 20/05/2021 08:24, Alex Blasche wrote: >> Congratulations to Johanna. Approver rights have been granted. > > ... not

[Development] Nominating Andreas Buhr as approver

Hi all, I’d like to nominate Andreas Buhr as approver for the Qt Project. Andreas has been working with Qt since he joined the Qt Company as a full-time employee in Germany about a year ago. I believe his patches [0] spesk for themselves. He has also participated actively in reviewing others’

Re: [Development] Qt 6.1.0 release note

On 4/28/21 11:11 AM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi! > > And thanks for your feedback! Some comments below. > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Development On Behalf Of >> Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development >> Sent: tiistai 27. huhtikuuta 2021 17.54 >> To: development@qt-project.org >>

[Development] Nominating Johanna Vanhatapio as an approver

to recording), and also participates actively in reviewing documentation patches. Commits: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:johanna.vanhatapio%2540qt.io Reviews: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:johanna.vanhatapio%2540qt.io -- Paul Wicking R Manager The Qt Company

Re: [Development] Nominating Andrei Golubev as Approver

+1 And I might add, he also makes an excellent job with documentation, including coming up with novel ideas for improvements. Much appreciated! Disclaimer: We’ve had beers once, in Oslo. //! Paul > On 18 Mar 2021, at 15:00, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to nominate

Re: [Development] Nominating Jarkko Koivikko as an approver

On 1/18/21 11:43 AM, Mitch Curtis wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to nominate Jarkko Koivikko as an approver for the Qt Project. +1 > Jarkko has been contributing to the Qt project since mid-2014, having > practically written the entirety of the Qt Virtual Keyboard module. His > knowledge in

Re: [Development] Nominating Inho Lee as an approver

+1 > On 28 Oct 2020, at 13:53, Andy Nichols wrote: > > +1 from Me. > > Inho has been a great contributor to Qt Quick 3D module over the last year. > He’s done a wonderful job working on the animation support and making sure > that features from GLTF2 work correctly. > He also does a

[Development] QUIP-18: Process for removal of maintainer or approver status

Hi, I’m proposing a QUIP [0] for governing how the Qt Project deals with inactive maintainers and/or approvers. The Qt Governance Model covers revokal of status as consequence of “extreme circumstances”. However, it has become apparent that there may be less extreme circumstances where the

[Development] "Examples and demos" component in Jira (QTBUG project)

new issue, and it will not impact our archives. -- Paul Wicking R Manager The Qt Company Sandakerveien 116 0484, Oslo, Norway paul.wick...@qt.io https://qt.io The Future is Written with Qt -- ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project

Re: [Development] Codereview maintenance break is over

> On 25 Aug 2020, at 18:52, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Can we configure it so the commit message is at least 80 columns wide? Since > our messages are wrapped at 72 right now but the display is narrower, it's > causing line-wrapping. > As far as I can find, the commit message box

Re: [Development] Codereview maintenance break is over

> On 25 Aug 2020, at 00:33, Иван Комиссаров wrote: > > I can no longer select and comment part of the line. macOS, Safari. Chrome > works though. Am I the only one having this issue? > Hi Ivan, That works as expected for me with macOS 10.15.6 and Safari 13.1.2 (also with FireFox). Seems

Re: [Development] Deprecating Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X and Q_STATIC_ASSERT

> On 11 Jun 2020, at 12:56, Lars Knoll wrote: > > We certainly shouldn’t start documenting the macros now in 5.15.1. Fine by me; I’ve abandoned the documentation effort and closed the reported bug as won’t do. -- Paul Wicking R Manager The Qt Company Sandakerveien 116 0

Re: [Development] Documenting Qt 6 API breakages

> On 27 May 2020, at 17:22, Riitta-Leena Miettinen > wrote: > > Hello, > > How about using a similar approach to that used for documenting the CMake > commands for each module in Qt 5.15? > > That is: > > • Create a qdoc file in each module that contains the breakages for > that

Re: [Development] Arttu Tarkiainen as approver

+1 > On 10 Mar 2020, at 12:56, Katja Marttila wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’d like to nominate Arttu Tarkiainen as approver for the Qt Project. > > Arttu has been working in the installer team as a SW developer since he > joined the Qt Company about one year ago. First as a trainee and

Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

+1. Disclaimer: I'm guilty for convincing him to join the gerrit admin team :) Paul On 02/03/2020, 23:17, "Development on behalf of Andy Shaw" wrote: +1 from me too Andy -Original Message- From: Development on behalf of Volker Hilsheimer Date:

Re: [Development] Stepping down as QDoc maintainer

Congratulations to Topi. I've recorded the change of maintainership in https://wiki.qt.io/Maintainers - Paul On 11/12/2019, 15:54, "Development on behalf of Martin Smith" wrote: I will now formally step down as QDoc maintainer. After 25 years using Qt (Qt license 0 at METIS), the last

Re: [Development] Stepping down as QDoc maintainer

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:52:09 + Martin Smith wrote: > I will now formally step down as QDoc maintainer. After 25 years > using Qt (Qt license 0 at METIS), the last 13 of those years > maintaining QDoc, first at Trolltech, then Nokia, then Digia, and now > at The Qt Comany, I am about to

Re: [Development] Contributing to Qt session at Qt World Summit

This sounds great! Was the session recorded, and if so is it viewable somewhere online, for people that weren't there? P. On 07/11/2019, 07:58, "Development on behalf of Tuukka Turunen" wrote: Hi, Yesterday morning at the Qt World Summit we had a session about

Re: [Development] Repo request for Qt Quick 3D module

Repository has been created as requested. - Paul From: Development on behalf of Andy Nichols Date: Wednesday, 14 August 2019 at 12:24 To: "development@qt-project.org" Subject: [Development] Repo request for Qt Quick 3D module Hello everyone,   As The Qt Company announced today on our blog,

[Development] Nominating Kavindra Palaraja for approvership

Hi all, I’d like to nominate Kavindra Palaraja as approver. She is a very active contributor and reviewer, in particular for documentation related changes, focusing on the Qt Automotive platform. She’s a former employee of Trolltech and Nokia, and has a lot of experience with Qt’s

Re: [Development] Nominating Mikhail Svetkin for Approver status

+1 Disclaimer: I sit on the other side of the wall from him. From: Gatis Paeglis Sent: Thursday, May 16, 8:09 PM Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Mikhail Svetkin for Approver status To: Tor Arne Vestbø, Volker Hilsheimer Cc: Qt development mailing list +1, long-overdue  From: Development

[Development] Nominating Ryan Chu for Approvership

://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Ryan+Chu%22,n,z Disclaimer: he sits 4 offices down the hall from me, and we're both on the Core & Network team. -- Paul Wicking Documentation Engineer The Qt Company Sandakerveien 116 0484, Oslo, Norway paul.wick...@qt.io +47 90 500 666 http://q

Re: [Development] Google Season of Docs

FYI, Due to the short notice, we have decided not to pursue participation in Google's Season of Docs this year. Perhaps we manage to get on this earlier if they repeat the initiative next year. - Paul On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:48:11 + Paul Wicking wrote: > Hi everyone, > &g

[Development] Google Season of Docs

Hi everyone, Google is launching an initiative called Season of Docs. The gist of it is that it's summer of code but for documentation. (https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/) A couple of us in the doc team here at TQtC have discussed it internally and we would like to sign up the Qt

Re: [Development] Jira changes going forward

Hi everybody, it's been a while since the last update[0] about the changes in Jira going forward. As discussed in the review on Gerrit[1] and during last year's contributors summit [2], the plan is to automate handling of Jira issues in the Need More Information (NMI) state. The automation

Re: [Development] Gerrit Bot closing reopened Bugs?

On 3/15/19 2:38 PM, Edward Welbourne wrote: > Please report a QTQAINFRA bug and assign to Frederik (who originally > proposed this tool). > ...or just fix it: https://git.qt.io/qtqa/jira-bug-closer P. ___ Development mailing list

[Development] Documentation workshop in Oslo

Some of us at the Qt Company are coming together for a workshop about our documentation, on 11th and 12th March. If you want more information, I've posted a short blog about it today [0]. Also, feel free to shoot me an email or ping me on IRC [1] if you have ideas or suggestions. Paul -- [0]

Re: [Development] Archiving is working

On 2/1/19 1:38 PM, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > It appears the archive has been restored, as far as I can tell. Thanks to > whoever got that done! > It is indeed much better! As some of you may have noticed, there are still a few things to iron out. Please report any further findings on the Jira

Re: [Development] Archiving is working

On 1/28/19 1:26 PM, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > >> On 28 Jan 2019, at 09:43, Mitch Curtis wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Development On Behalf Of >>> Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development >>> Sent: Friday, 25 January 2019 7:23 PM >>> To: development@qt-project.org >>> Subject:

Re: [Development] Issues with 'Fixes' keyword

On 1/18/19 2:27 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > I suggest to commit the sources to the qtqa repo. > +1 ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

y. I wish that for each of you. Live long and prosper. -- Paul Wicking Documentation Engineer The Qt Company https://qt.io/ ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development