Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-28 Thread Tim Murison
> The Qt Company is a public company; we are not yet profitable, but things are > getting there. Given how significant the Qt Company contribution to Qt is, > making it a sustainable business should be in the interest of anyone that > wants to see Qt continue to be a successful and evolving

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

2018-03-09 Thread Tim Murison
> Thanks Tim, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one. I *highly* > recommend the Wt toolkit (https://www.webtoolkit.eu/widgets) , even > if it's not LGPL. The Widget gallery is implemented in Wt, and you > can see they have everything, and even a working TreeView! Your > QWidget experience will

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

2018-03-09 Thread Tim Murison
> > While I am excited about this, I still wonder that it's the right > approach. By right, I mean scalable. > After evaluating the WebGL platform (which I was excited about as > well) had having extreme performance issues, I foresee that this will > has performance issues as well, because of