On 06 Jun 2014, at 12:23, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
Just for clarity:
* Is the release branch gone for developers?
it's gone for everyone. it has been deleted.
the next release branch will be
I'd say, the 'dev' even does not be a complete words. so run a poll sounds
be fair.
2014-06-06 13:54 GMT+08:00 Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.com:
Whether or not next is a better name than dev is your opinion, it isn't
necessarily a fact. I for one like dev and find it a name better than
Em sex 06 jun 2014, às 14:00:19, Yuchen Deng escreveu:
I'd say, the 'dev' even does not be a complete words. so run a poll sounds
be fair.
Let's run at QtCS next week. I don't think we'll ever get a better sampling of
people involved in Qt development.
Someone who feels strongly about the
Em sex 06 jun 2014, às 13:50:07, Yuchen Deng escreveu:
The people know the 'release' 'stable' branch for a long time TOO.
but it will gone for soon. right?
They will be gone not because they are confusing and people didn't know what
they mean. They are being replaced so that we have a
On 06/06/14 08:20, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Em sex 06 jun 2014, às 14:00:19, Yuchen Deng escreveu:
I'd say, the 'dev' even does not be a complete words. so run a poll
sounds
be fair.
Let's run at QtCS next week. I don't think we'll ever get a better
sampling of
people
Just for clarity:
* Is the release branch gone for developers?
* And is there only one dev branch? Suppose 5.4 is in the make and meanwhile a
5.3.x patch release is being worked upon,
where will the dev branch end up? Or should we just push our patches to the
5.3.x in that case?
Cheers,
Kurt
hello,
we finally have CI setups for the new branching scheme. this means that
5.3 (and 1.0 in enginio) are now the target branches for stabilization
changes aimed at the 5.3.1 release.
the stable branches will continue to exist for the next weeks and will
be merged into 5.3/1.0 regularly, so
Hi,
I found it a little not clear:
the stable branches will continue to exist for the next weeks
but after week, where to need to do push new changes? in /5.3.2 ? /dev? :)
however, do not push new reviews for/stable
but where then to do push for new reviews?
BR,
Denis
2014-06-05 18:39
Hi,
On 05.06.2014 16:52, Denis Shienkov wrote:
Hi,
I found it a little not clear:
the stable branches will continue to exist for the next weeks
but after week, where to need to do push new changes? in /5.3.2 ? /dev? :)
see below
however, do not push new reviews for/stable
but
Why do not change the 'dev' branch to 'next' ? or, just '5.4' instead?
I don't got it for new branching scheme.
2014-06-05 23:00 GMT+08:00 Sergio Ahumada sahum...@blackberry.com:
5.4.0 = refs/for/dev
--
Best Regards
Yuchen
___
Development
Sergio, many thanks..
BR,
Denis
05.06.2014 19:00, Sergio Ahumada пишет:
Hi,
On 05.06.2014 16:52, Denis Shienkov wrote:
Hi,
I found it a little not clear:
the stable branches will continue to exist for the next weeks
but after week, where to need to do push new changes? in /5.3.2 ?
I think 'next' work tell people, it's the next release, for now it's
unstable.
But 'dev' don't tell people anything.
Because all of the branch should being develop state. except the release
branch, e.g. '5.3.x'.
Why this 'dev' branch is special?
Why don't use a better name?
2014-06-05 23:31
Em sex 06 jun 2014, às 13:22:28, Yuchen Deng escreveu:
I think 'next' work tell people, it's the next release, for now it's
unstable.
But 'dev' don't tell people anything.
Because all of the branch should being develop state. except the release
branch, e.g. '5.3.x'.
Why this 'dev' branch is
The people know the 'release' 'stable' branch for a long time TOO.
but it will gone for soon. right?
so, Why 'release' 'stable' need to gone because some reasons, but 'dev'
does not? and we have a reason: better understand for many people will
touch Qt in future.
If we need to change the
that it is.
Simon
Fra: Yuchen Deng
Sendt: 07:23 fredag 6. juni 2014
Til: Thiago Macieira
Kopi: development
Emne: Re: [Development] [HEADS UP] new branching scheme: 5.3 branches created,
stable deprecated
I think 'next' work tell people, it's the next release, for now it's unstable.
But 'dev' don't tell
15 matches
Mail list logo
