Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-03-02 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On 1 March 2018 at 13:22, Thiago Macieira wrote: [snip] >> > Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable. [snip] > Please move them to another module until they're ready, or at least disable > the building unless explicitly enabled. > > Debian wasn't

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-03-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 04:56:19 PST Kai Koehne wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > > Subject: Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D > > > > El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer&qu

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-03-01 Thread Kai Koehne
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > Subject: Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D > > El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer" <s...@theharmers.co.uk > <mailto:s...@theharmers.co.uk> > escr

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-03-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer" escribió: Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable. Ok, so we have probably misunderstood that part. Just as an idea, would it be possible to tag tech preview symbols as we do for private ones? On one hand it

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-03-01 Thread Sean Harmer
Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable. Cheers, Sean On 28/02/2018 16:40, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian and noticed that some symbols where missing. We understood that Qt3D (the submodule)

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-02-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 08:40:29 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > if there are libs inside that aren't stable ABI, they should > be moved to a separate module So asking the maintainers: is the whole Qt3D module keeping binary compatibility? If not, which libraries in it

Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-02-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On 28 February 2018 at 13:40, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian > and noticed that some symbols where missing. Sorry, forgot to mention that the previously attached txt shows each missing

[Development] API breackage in Qt3D

2018-02-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian and noticed that some symbols where missing. We understood that Qt3D (the submodule) was API/ABI stable, but Konstantin Tokarev pointed out: https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/qt/ "NOTE: The libQt53D* objects are