On 1 March 2018 at 13:22, Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip]
>> > Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable.
[snip]
> Please move them to another module until they're ready, or at least disable
> the building unless explicitly enabled.
>
> Debian wasn't
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 04:56:19 PST Kai Koehne wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt-
> > Subject: Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D
> >
> > El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer&qu
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt-
> Subject: Re: [Development] API breackage in Qt3D
>
> El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer" <s...@theharmers.co.uk
> <mailto:s...@theharmers.co.uk> > escr
El 1 mar. 2018 6:11 a.m., "Sean Harmer" escribió:
Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable.
Ok, so we have probably misunderstood that part.
Just as an idea, would it be possible to tag tech preview symbols as we do
for private ones?
On one hand it
Animation and Extras are tech preview. The rest are stable.
Cheers,
Sean
On 28/02/2018 16:40, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian
and noticed that some symbols where missing. We understood that Qt3D
(the submodule)
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 08:40:29 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> if there are libs inside that aren't stable ABI, they should
> be moved to a separate module
So asking the maintainers: is the whole Qt3D module keeping binary
compatibility?
If not, which libraries in it
On 28 February 2018 at 13:40, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian
> and noticed that some symbols where missing.
Sorry, forgot to mention that the previously attached txt shows each
missing
Hi! today I was packaging Qt3D (meaning the the submodule) for Debian
and noticed that some symbols where missing. We understood that Qt3D
(the submodule) was API/ABI stable, but Konstantin Tokarev pointed
out:
https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/qt/ "NOTE: The libQt53D*
objects are