Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-28 Thread André Somers
Tony Van Eerd schreef op 27-2-2014 21:06: Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know it is very closely related to Qt: On http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B there is: You cannot... - For existing

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-28 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 27 February 2014 17:09:59 Thiago Macieira wrote: Maybe techbase is deprecated and everything is moving to the newer wikis. It's not deprecated. -- David Faure | david.fa...@kdab.com | Managing Director KDAB France KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-28 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2014-02-27, 16:18:32, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions?

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 11:10:41, André Somers escreveu: To me, it doesn't sound reasonable to expect an unqualified func to stay source compatible. If you want your code to be source compatible with future vesions and you use function pointers, I'd suggest to always use the longer, ugly cast

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-28 Thread Tony Van Eerd
Compatibility question (KDE) Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 11:10:41, André Somers escreveu: To me, it doesn't sound reasonable to expect an unqualified func to stay source compatible. If you want your code to be source compatible with future vesions and you use function pointers, I'd suggest to always

[Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tony Van Eerd
Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know it is very closely related to Qt: On http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B there is: You cannot... - For existing functions of any type: - add an overload

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tony Van Eerd
+tvaneerd=blackberry@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Tony Van Eerd Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:06 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE) Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 20:06:04, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Sorry, there is probably a KDE email list or something that I should post this to, but I know it is very closely related to Qt: On http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B there is: You cannot...

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big question is: where's the create account link? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big question is: where's the create account link?

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't have permissions? :-( You can only edit after logging in. Now the big

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às 22:21:28, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: Thanks, but it seems I don't

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 08:46:09, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: Em qui 27 fev 2014, às

Re: [Development] Binary Compatibility question (KDE)

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Jansen
On Thursday 27 February 2014 17:09:59 Thiago Macieira wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 08:46:09, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: On 28 February 2014 08:18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em sex 28 fev 2014, às 00:39:05, Tomasz Olszak escreveu: 2014-02-28 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thiago