On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:04:54AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:46:07 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
> >
> > It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> > something happens (or fails) over
On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:46:07 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
>
> It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> something happens (or fails) over polling a web interface too.
Could this change also be the reason why the
On 8-7-2014 11:31, Ulf Hermann wrote:
>> the question is why you find it workflow-defining. why do you in
>> your role as a _reviewer_ need to track integration progress? the
>> process is supposed to be contributor-driven.
>
> Sometimes you're waiting for someone's change to go in because you have
> the question is why you find it workflow-defining. why do you in
> your role as a _reviewer_ need to track integration progress? the
> process is supposed to be contributor-driven.
Sometimes you're waiting for someone's change to go in because you have another
one that depends on it. Then the P
Oswald Buddenhagen [oswald.buddenha...@digia.com]
> > > [...]
> > > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
> >
> > It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> > something happens (or fails) over polling a web interface too.
> >
> > I am also mildly surpri
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:46:07AM +, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Blasche Alexander wrote:
> > Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > >i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
> > >the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
> > >on the downside, you now
On 08/07/2014 08:46, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Blasche Alexander wrote:
>> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
>>> the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
>>> on the downside, you now need to pay more attenti
>> i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
>> the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
>> on the downside, you now need to pay more attention in case you adopt a
>> change from someone else, as you are still a reviewer as far as gerrit
>> i
Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
> >the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
> >on the downside, you now need to pay more attention in case you adopt a
> >change from someone el
From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of
Oswald Buddenhagen >
>i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
>the right to m
10 matches
Mail list logo
