Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-27 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 26 Aug 2014, at 10:45 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote: This leaves me with only one option. We have to deploy Bluez 4.101 headers to 11.10 machines. It doesn't even have to be a full backport as the dependency is a compile time dependency. My tests have shown that calling ::connect() with

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-26 Thread Blasche Alexander
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Exojo How feasable is to backport a newer BlueZ to that old distro, on the machines that build the

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-26 Thread Blasche Alexander
-- Alex -Original Message- From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira That would mean these are the minimum versions the popular distros (release month

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-26 Thread Robin Burchell
Thanks for starting the thread, Alex. I still hadn't had time to really do my homework on my side of this problem, apart from talking to you :-) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Blasche Alexander alexander.blas...@digia.com wrote: It is my understanding that the current Linux release binary

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:45:38 Blasche Alexander wrote: month in parentheses): Arch (rolling release) CentOS 7.0 (7/2014) Debian testing (no release!) Fedora 17 (5/2012) Mageia 3 (5/2013) Mint 13 (5/2012) OpenSUSE 12.2 (9/2012) Ubuntu 12.04

[Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-25 Thread Blasche Alexander
Hi, It is my understanding that the current Linux release binary packages are built on Ubuntu 11.10 machines. This is very ancient. In fact for Bluetooth Low Energy (new feature in 5.4) this is too ancient. What's needed is a machine that has Bluez 4.101 or newer. This means even the fairly

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-25 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Monday 25 August 2014, Blasche Alexander escribió: Hi, It is my understanding that the current Linux release binary packages are built on Ubuntu 11.10 machines. This is very ancient. In fact for Bluetooth Low Energy (new feature in 5.4) this is too ancient. The reason to use an old

Re: [Development] Linux release binaries too old

2014-08-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 25 August 2014 15:25:26 Blasche Alexander wrote: Hi, It is my understanding that the current Linux release binary packages are built on Ubuntu 11.10 machines. This is very ancient. In fact for Bluetooth Low Energy (new feature in 5.4) this is too ancient. What's needed is a