Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

Thanks John. The reason why we have been so far listing all the supported platforms is limitations of new platform versions until needed fixes are in place. Let's think how to best unify the way you propose to the wiki and doc supported platform pages. I do fully agree with you point, we need t

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

ng static builds and >> thus gain support for App Extensions. >> >> Thoughts? Tor Arne? >> -- >> Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@theqtcompany.com >> Consulting Services Engineer - The Qt Company >> >> From: Development on behalf of >> Turunen Tuukka >

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

On 9 January 2016 at 01:05, John Layt wrote: > > On 8 January 2016 at 07:18, Turunen Tuukka > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> This item was discussed at Qt Contributor’s Summit, please see session >> notes: http://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2015_LTS >> >> >> >> For compilers this is also documented

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

On 8 January 2016 at 07:18, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > This item was discussed at Qt Contributor’s Summit, please see session > notes: http://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2015_LTS > > > > For compilers this is also documented to the Qt Base change log: > http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/t

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

On 08/01/16 11:24, Petroules Jake wrote: We're raising the minimum OS X to 10.8 (2012). The iOS minimum is still 6 (also 2012), but I wonder whether we should also raise that a version (or even two) considering its uniquely rapid upgrade cycle (frequently upgraded hardware, less user ability to o

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

eqtcompany.com>> > Date: Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 11:18 PM > To: John Layt mailto:jl...@kde.org>>, > "development@qt-project.org <mailto:development@qt-project.org>" > mailto:development@qt-project.org>> > Subject: Re: [Development] Minimum Deploy

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

ny.com>> Date: Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 11:18 PM To: John Layt mailto:jl...@kde.org>>, "development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>" mailto:development@qt-project.org>> Subject: Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

dPlatforms/index.html This has not yet been > updated to 5.6, but will be before the final release. > > > > Yours, > > > > Tuukka > > > > > > > > *From:* Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org > ]

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of John Layt Sent: keskiviikkona 30. joulukuuta 2015 20.43 To: development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards? Hi, Can I just clarify what the minimum deployment platforms are for 5

Re: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

: keskiviikkona 30. joulukuuta 2015 20.43 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards? Hi, Can I just clarify what the minimum deployment platforms are for 5.7 onwards? That is, the lowest version of each OS that the code must still run on? Far as I can

[Development] Minimum Deployment Platforms for 5.7 onwards?

Hi, Can I just clarify what the minimum deployment platforms are for 5.7 onwards? That is, the lowest version of each OS that the code must still run on? Far as I can tell it's something like: Windows 7 (or Vista?) Windows Embedded Compact 2013 OSX 10.8 iOS 5.0? Android 4.1 (API Level 16)? RHEL