Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-08 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 30/06/2019 10.10, Holger Freyther wrote: > On 28. Jun 2019, at 00:57, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> In this particular case, Google loves to use Bazel. Everyone else hates that >> they do. >> >> Ask anyone trying to package Tensorflow. > > Some Ex-Googlers like it too. It seems there is a

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-05 Thread Edward Welbourne
On fredag 28. juni 2019 17:29:29 CEST Mutz, Marc wrote: >> I don't know whether there's a plugin for that, but a feature that >> would really benefit a lot of Qt devs would be if Gerrit would >> understand whether the Merge Conflict is due to a prerequisite commit >> not having been merged, yet,

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-04 Thread Robert Loehning
Am 01.07.2019 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: and I'll give Gravatar a spin: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-gravata r >> >> It's there, enjoy and put your avatar up at

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-02 Thread Kari Oikarinen
On 2.7.2019 15.13, Kari Oikarinen wrote: > > On 2.7.2019 14.59, Cristian Adam wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Development On Behalf Of >>> Frederik Gladhorn >>> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11 >>> To: Qt Project Developm

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-02 Thread Kari Oikarinen
On 2.7.2019 14.59, Cristian Adam wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Development On Behalf Of >> Frederik Gladhorn >> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11 >> To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List >> Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9 &

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-02 Thread Cristian Adam
> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Frederik Gladhorn > Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11 > To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List > Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9 > > Hi, > > Just to keep the ball rolling, we pre

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-02 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On mandag 1. juli 2019 21:23:35 CEST André Hartmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not sure if it's related to the gravatars, but Gerrit became > horrible slow here (this is on a 2MBit DSL line). It's almost unuseable. > > Has someone else experienced the same? Yes, it slowed to a crawl yesterday,

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-01 Thread André Hartmann
Hi all, I'm not sure if it's related to the gravatars, but Gerrit became horrible slow here (this is on a 2MBit DSL line). It's almost unuseable. Has someone else experienced the same? Regards, André Am 01.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz: On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +,

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-01 Thread André Pönitz
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > > and I'll give Gravatar a spin: > > > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-gravata > > > r > > It's there, enjoy and put your avatar up at https://gravatar.com . I know it's a bit late and it

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-01 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
And we're on 2.16.9, which brings no huge improvements as far as I can tell. But it's great to gather some experience and more and more automate the deployment of new versions. Enjoy! On torsdag 27. juni 2019 16:53:26 CEST Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn >

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-07-01 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On fredag 28. juni 2019 17:29:29 CEST Mutz, Marc wrote: > On 2019-06-27 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > [...] > > > On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new > > Gerrit, > > I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add > > reviewers > > based

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-30 Thread Holger Freyther
> On 28. Jun 2019, at 00:57, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 27 June 2019 08:24:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> 27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" : >>> On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote: The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-28 Thread Mutz, Marc via Development
On 2019-06-27 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: [...] On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit, I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add reviewers based on git blame

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-28 Thread Kari Oikarinen
On 27.6.2019 17.53, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > >> On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >> >> On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit, >> I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add reviewers >> based on git blame >>

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 08:24:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" : > > On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > >> The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version > >> seems to only compile with one exact

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Simon Hausmann
That’s good news! Thanks for making the upgrades :) Simon > On 27. Jun 2019, at 16:15, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > Hi, > > Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit > 2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise > for us to

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >>  The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version >>  seems to only compile with one exact Bazel version (roughly). > > Argument against home-cooked, not-widely-used

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version > seems to only compile with one exact Bazel version (roughly). Argument against home-cooked, not-widely-used build systems right here. -- Thiago Macieira -

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit, > I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add reviewers > based on git blame >

[Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

2019-06-27 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hi, Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit 2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise for us to stay up to date and see if the scripting of the upgrade works. The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit