On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sábado, 7 de dezembro de 2013 15:03:26, Chris Colbert wrote:
Is there a line missing from Option A, just after the line for stdin?
This specific compiler did not output anything for this case.
That case was a
On Sunday 08 December 2013 12:09:16 Kurt Pattyn wrote:
On 08 Dec 2013, at 12:00, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Just a quick poll: which order do you think is more intuitive?
[...]
To me option B is more comprehensive to me.
In the other example:
[...]
I prefer option A.
+2
--
On 08 Dec 2013, at 12:00, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Just a quick poll: which order do you think is more intuitive?
Option A:
qobjectdefs.h:69:20: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘protected’
# define signals protected
^
stdin:1:6: note: in
Hi guys
Just a quick poll: which order do you think is more intuitive?
Option A:
qobjectdefs.h:69:20: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘protected’
# define signals protected
^
stdin:1:6: note: in expansion of macro ‘signals’
Option B:
stdin:1:6: error: expected
Is there a line missing from Option A, just after the line for stdin?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.comwrote:
Hi guys
Just a quick poll: which order do you think is more intuitive?
Option A:
qobjectdefs.h:69:20: error: expected unqualified-id before
On sábado, 7 de dezembro de 2013 15:03:26, Chris Colbert wrote:
Is there a line missing from Option A, just after the line for stdin?
This specific compiler did not output anything for this case.
That case was a misuse of a macro. Here's another example, where the problem
is inside the macro.
In the first example, Option B contained more information than Option A, to
the point where Option A would leave me head-scratching for a while. In the
newer example, I also find the order of Option B to be more intuitive.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Thiago Macieira
