Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

u...@theqtcompany.com] Sent: 03 December 2015 12:30 To: Mark De Wit <mark.de...@iesve.com<mailto:mark.de...@iesve.com>>; development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: RE: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Hi Mark,

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

/releases Mark -Original Message- From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Exojo Sent: 03 December 2015 19:08 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries El Thursday 03 December

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

velopment@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Will Qt 5.6 have alternative methods to export HTML to PDF that support major platforms of Android, iOS, Linux, OS X, and Windows? On iOS a Qt develo

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

mark.de...@iesve.com>>; development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.com<mailto:andy.s...@theqtcompany.com>> wr

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

2015 13:31 To: Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.com> Cc: Mark De Wit <mark.de...@iesve.com>; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.co

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

;mark.de...@iesve.com<mailto:mark.de...@iesve.com>>; development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.com<mailto:

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

03.12.2015, 15:41, "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" : > On Thursday 03 December 2015, Mark De Wit wrote: >>  Hi all, >> >>  QtWebEngine does not yet have feature parity with QtWebkit. For instance, >>  print support (especially export to PDF) is a critical requirement for my >>  use of

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

Op 03/12/2015 om 12:18 schreef Mark De Wit: Hi all, QtWebEngine does not yet have feature parity with QtWebkit. For instance, print support (especially export to PDF) is a critical requirement for my use of Webkit. This missing feature prevents me from migrating to WebEngine. Removing

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Hi all, QtWebEngine does not yet have feature parity with QtWebkit. For instance, print support (especially export to PDF) is a critical requirement for my use of Webkit. This missing feature prevents me from migrating to WebEngine. Removing

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

On Thursday 03 December 2015, Mark De Wit wrote: > Hi all, > > QtWebEngine does not yet have feature parity with QtWebkit. For instance, > print support (especially export to PDF) is a critical requirement for my > use of Webkit. This missing feature prevents me from migrating to > WebEngine. >

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

regards, Mark From: Turunen Tuukka [mailto:tuukka.turu...@theqtcompany.com] Sent: 03 December 2015 12:30 To: Mark De Wit <mark.de...@iesve.com>; development@qt-project.org Subject: RE: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Hi Mark, If you need to use Qt

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Will Qt 5.6 have alternative methods to export HTML to PDF that support major platforms of Android, iOS, Linux, OS X, and Windows? On iOS a Qt developer must resort to native code to generate

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

gt;>; development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: RE: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Hi Mark, If you need to use Qt Webkit, then it is probably better to stay with Qt 5.5. There is nothing that makes Qt 5.5 bad overnigh

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

On Thursday 03 December 2015 18:13:58 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > Instead, you should build this: > > http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/qtwebkit-o > > pensource-src-5.5.1.zip > > http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/qtwebkit-> > > >

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

On Thursday 03 December 2015 15:54:42 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > Besides being possible to use QtWebKit from 5.5 with Qt 5.6, there are > > also > > QtWebKit 5.6.0 sources in git, they are just not part of the official > > release. > Why not at least package its sources them same way as are

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

03.12.2015, 18:05, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Thursday 03 December 2015 15:54:42 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  > Besides being possible to use QtWebKit from 5.5 with Qt 5.6, there are >>  > also >>  > QtWebKit 5.6.0 sources in git, they are just not part of the official

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

El Thursday 03 December 2015, Mark De Wit escribió: > Building from source would be an option, I guess. We have done it in the > past, but the build process / flags (for distribution) is not sufficiently > well documented, and starting with 5.5.1 we were excited to be able to use > official