The module is now available under git clone
https://codereview.qt-project.org/qt/qtscxml.
There is still some refactoring ongoing as the very recent API review created
good suggestions and revealed some issues. Therefore stay tuned.
--
Alex
From:
Hello,
Interested parties would like to know whether this [qtscxml] module will be
remaining under the LGPL license for Qt 5.7 (and beyond) to the best of
current knowledge.
Thanks!
--
David
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Hi David,
The new Qt SCXML is licensed under LGPLv3 (and GPL and Commercial), and there
are no plans to remove the LGPLv3 option of it. There are a few tooling parts
that are GPLv3 (with exceptions) just like the other tools and applications
going forward. So it is possible to use Qt SCXML
+1 for making it a TP in 5.7 and another +1 for Erik becoming the maintainer.
Cheers,
Lars
On 25/01/16 19:49, "Development on behalf of Turunen Tuukka"
wrote:
>
>+1
>
>State machine framework has been part of
Hello
I'm just curious, is Qt project aiming for be a umbrella of libraries tied
to Qt release or this libraries like QtGamePad on other thread
should be more suitable to something like inqlude.org ( or similar ).
Just to clarify, as a distro packager too.
[]'s
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:47
Hi,
As part of the renewed publishing process following the new KDE Free Qt
foundation agreement, we'd like to publish the source of the new Qt SCXML
module.
I'd like to propose the module to be accepted as part of the Qt add-on modules.
The module itself is brand new as well (target is a
+1
State machine framework has been part of Qt for many years and there was also
some work earlier for scxml compatibility, which was never completed. SCXML is
an industry standard format, which can be exported from multiple different
tools.
Yours,
Tuukka
> Blasche Alexander
On Monday, January 25, 2016 02:55:27 PM Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of the renewed publishing process following the new KDE Free Qt
> foundation agreement, we'd like to publish the source of the new Qt SCXML
> module.
>
> I'd like to propose the module to be accepted as part of