Look ok to me.
Lars
On 23/04/14 12:55, "Simon Hausmann" wrote:
>On Tuesday 22. April 2014 14.12.46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> http://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-5.3/QtQml.diff
>
>I think those changes look okay.
>
>The bulk of the work going into Qml right now is all focused on the
>internals
>firs
On Tuesday 22. April 2014 14.12.46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> http://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-5.3/QtQml.diff
I think those changes look okay.
The bulk of the work going into Qml right now is all focused on the internals
first.
Simon
___
Development maili
On Tuesday 22. April 2014 16.37.06 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em ter 22 abr 2014, às 14:12:46, Thiago Macieira escreveu:
> > diff --git a/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h b/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h
>
> Why do we have a public header with "private" in the name?
It part of the "private" interface into the
Em ter 22 abr 2014, às 14:12:46, Thiago Macieira escreveu:
> diff --git a/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h b/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h
Why do we have a public header with "private" in the name?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
http://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-5.3/QtQml.diff
diff --git a/src/qml/qml/qqml.h b/src/qml/qml/qqml.h
index b6c6fe8..721f2cc 100644
--- a/src/qml/qml/qqml.h
+++ b/src/qml/qml/qqml.h
@@ -91,13 +91,13 @@ class QQmlPropertyValueInterceptor;
const char *className = T::staticMetaObject.className(); \