On Monday 8. June 2015 17:57:23 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 15:58:23 Olivier Goffart wrote:
There is no reason to stop improving qmetatype.
The qFatal was there for a good reason.
It was there for a good reason for the existing flags.
But for new flags of
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 12:10:02 Olivier Goffart wrote:
A change in the IsGadget flag is fine.
Old code did not need this flag. And code that relies on it requires anyway
that the code that register the types register the isGadget flag.
Even if one could build a complicated use case that
On Monday 08 June 2015 15:58:23 Olivier Goffart wrote:
There is no reason to stop improving qmetatype.
The qFatal was there for a good reason.
It was there for a good reason for the existing flags.
But for new flags of course it does not make sens.
It did make sense: the idea was
On Saturday 6. June 2015 11:17:30 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:28 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I can't tell if the qmetatype.h template magic is binary compatible or not.
As evidenced by a recent push [1] about the IsGadget flag, it isn't.
I'm going to put a stop to
On Monday 8. June 2015 09:34:30 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 11:28:48 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Saturday 6. June 2015 11:17:30 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:28 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I can't tell if the qmetatype.h template magic is binary
On Monday 08 June 2015 11:28:48 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Saturday 6. June 2015 11:17:30 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:28 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I can't tell if the qmetatype.h template magic is binary compatible or
not.
As evidenced by a recent push [1]
On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:28 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I can't tell if the qmetatype.h template magic is binary compatible or not. As
evidenced by a recent push [1] about the IsGadget flag, it isn't.
I'm going to put a stop to this. qmetatype.h template magic is now frozen as
of Qt 5.5 and
