Kai Koehne (20 March 2018 09:34)
> I would rather create a task in JIRA for the review itself, with priority 1
> and appropriate fixVersion. Any subsequent findings could be made subtasks of
> this task.
>
> This automatically makes the API review part of the blockers list, and makes
> sure
>
(comment below)
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Jani Heikkinen
> Subject: [Development] Qt API review process (was: Re: Qt 5.11 Alpha
> released)
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have API
Jani Heikkinen (14 March 2018 08:03) wrote:
> We have API review ongoing for Qt 5.11.
> For me our process for that is a bit unclear;
That sounds like something we should aim to turn into a QUIP,
once discussion here has produced something close enough to
a consensus to be worth documenting.
Hi all,
We have API review ongoing for Qt 5.11. For me our process for that is a bit
unclear; At which point we can say the review is really done? There are
comments in the reviews but then pretty much nothing... At some there is -1,
few +1 but that's it. I think we should clarify the process
