What I forgot to say in my first mail:
We would want to use that in 4.8, where we don't want to change the
default behaviour anyhow. How about option 3 below, where the default
can be set to "yes" in Qt5 globally or per platform once we are
confident it works?
The benefit of that option is that
On terça-feira, 16 de outubro de 2012 14.55.24, shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote:
> > I'd create a (wall-clock) timer and enable the DHCP resolution on
> > Windows only once every 10 minutes. I'd also use it as a fallback if
> > and only if the DNS resolution failed.
>
> That doesn't help with the
ect: Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default
>
> On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 16.33.39,
> shane.kea...@accenture.com
> wrote:
> > When using the windows API, we can enable either DNS, DHCP or both.
> > Using DNS only would be faster, but may not wo
On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 16.33.39, shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote:
> When using the windows API, we can enable either DNS, DHCP or both.
> Using DNS only would be faster, but may not work for some users if their
> office network used DHCP only deployment.
>
> Also, I checked toda
om]
Sent: 15 October 2012 16:00
To: Kearns, Shane
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default
Hi Shane,
(adding the ML back in again…)
wouldn't Windows run the DHCP detection only once at startup (or when network
status changes) and cache the result? Why would we
s [lars.kn...@digia.com]
> Sent: 15 October 2012 08:39
> To: Kearns, Shane
> Subject: Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default
>
> I'd agree with Simon that #4 would be the best default option from a user
> experience point of view. Most likely it's also wha
On quinta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2012 14.02.11, shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote:
> Libproxy performance is unknown, I've only done functional testing.
I'd rather not use libproxy until we're certain we can tell it which JS
library to use. It needs to be one of ours, not webkit-gtk or mozjs.
-
> IMHO #4 gives the best out-of-the-box experience.
>
> Is there a way to do the blocking winapi call in a thread on app start-
> up maybe?
Doesn't help if the first thing an application wants to do is download
something from the network.
It would only help because of the workaround we already ha
IMHO #4 gives the best out-of-the-box experience.
Is there a way to do the blocking winapi call in a thread on app start-up maybe?
How do other apps (i.e. Chrome) handle this without blocking the user
experience?
Simon
--
Sendt fra min Nokia N911.10.12 15:12 skrev Peter Hartmann:
Hello,
I r
Subject: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default
>
> Hello,
>
> I remember this has been discussed before, but yet again: How about
> using the system proxy by default, at least on some platforms or by
> configure switch? Right now every app developer has to call
> QNetw
Hello,
I remember this has been discussed before, but yet again: How about
using the system proxy by default, at least on some platforms or by
configure switch? Right now every app developer has to call
QNetworkProxyFactory::setUseSystemConfiguration(true) in his code to use
the system proxies
11 matches
Mail list logo
