Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-04-06 Thread Sona Kurazyan
ards, Sona From: Development On Behalf Of Sona Kurazyan Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 10:30 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6 Hi, Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module i

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-28 Thread Alex Blasche
>From: Development on behalf of Kevin >Kofler > Sona Kurazyan wrote: > Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): > > * QLinkedList > * QRegExp > * QStateMachine > * QStringRef > * QList > * QJsonDocument::fromB

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-27 Thread Marc Mutz via Development
+1 On 2020-01-24 10:29, Sona Kurazyan wrote: Hi, Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module in Qt 6 for the Qt 5 classes that will be no longer maintained in Qt 6. Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312):

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-27 Thread Sona Kurazyan
Hi, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Can we have the XML SAX API in that module too? AIUI, Qt 6 will only include > the XML stream API and the XML DOM API (the latter being ported from SAX > to streams as the underlying implementation). That's right, in Qt 6 we won't use the SAX APIs internally anymore. As

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sona Kurazyan wrote: > Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): > > * QLinkedList > * QRegExp > * QStateMachine > * QStringRef > * QList > * QJsonDocument::fromBinaryData() Can we have the XML SAX API in that m

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Sona Kurazyan
placeholder, because I'm the one who is requesting. Best regards, Sona From: Edward Welbourne Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 4:32 PM To: Sona Kurazyan Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be

Re: [Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Edward Welbourne
Sona Kurazyan (24 January 2020 10:29) > Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module in Qt 6 > for the Qt 5 classes that will be no longer maintained in Qt 6. > > Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): > > *

[Development] Requesting a module for Qt5 classes that won't be maintained in Qt6

2020-01-24 Thread Sona Kurazyan
Hi, Previously there were discussions that we need to have a new module in Qt 6 for the Qt 5 classes that will be no longer maintained in Qt 6. Here are some candidates to be moved there in Qt 6 (see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-80312): * QLinkedList * QRegExp * QStateMach