On 10 March 2015 at 14:22, Jan Kundrát j...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 16:27:44 CET, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
* RHEL 6 ships 1.0.0, EOL Nov 2020
This is a bit more complex with RHEL because there are many RHEL 6s. RHEL
6.5 and newer ship with 1.0.1e [1], so they are already
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 16:27:44 CET, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
* RHEL 6 ships 1.0.0, EOL Nov 2020
This is a bit more complex with RHEL because there are many RHEL 6s. RHEL
6.5 and newer ship with 1.0.1e [1], so they are already covered. The older
OpenSSL 1.0.0 was present in 6.0 to 6.4.
Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
* RHEL 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
* CentOS 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
I think you mean 2024 there (2014 + 10 years).
Of course there are other considerations, like RHEL/CentOS 6 both
shipping GCC 4.4, so we might end up dropping support for those
distributions for
On 24 February 2015 at 03:49, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
* RHEL 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
* CentOS 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
I think you mean 2024 there (2014 + 10 years).
Whooops, yes, of course. My bad...
Of course there are other considerations, like RHEL/CentOS 6
On 21 February 2015 at 18:38, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
I suspect enterprise distros etc. will continue to support 1.0.0 for a
while. I'm not sure of the level of adoption of 1.0.1 at the moment, so I
was erring on the side of caution. Any feedback on this is welcome.
On Sunday 22 February 2015 18:50:24 Jeremy Lainé wrote:
I understood what you were saying, I think I just expressed my concerns
poorly. When I said now way to build even from source, I meant no way
to build support for OpenSSL as shipped by Apple. Anyway, my main
concern is : how do we
On Sunday 22 February 2015 13:37:36 Richard Moore wrote:
On 21 February 2015 at 18:38, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
I suspect enterprise distros etc. will continue to support 1.0.0 for a
while. I'm not sure of the level of adoption of 1.0.1 at the moment, so
I
On 21 February 2015 at 19:06, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
I suspect enterprise distros etc. will continue to support 1.0.0 for a
while. I'm not sure of the level of adoption of 1.0.1 at the moment, so I
was erring on the side of caution. Any feedback on this is welcome.
Quick
On 22 February 2015 at 17:50, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 06:42 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
On 22 February 2015 at 17:39, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
Whilst I agree with the goal of dropping support for old / unmaintained
OpenSSL versions, in the
On 02/22/2015 06:57 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
Slightly off-topic but related : does the Qt Company have any
privileged access to Apple engineers working on Secure Transport?
I would like to understand what the plans are regarding support
for NPN / ALPN.
No idea on that
Hi Rich,
On 02/21/2015 06:30 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a while and was really only retained
since it is the only version apple ship on OS X
On 22 February 2015 at 17:39, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
Hi Rich,
On 02/21/2015 06:30 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a
On 02/22/2015 06:42 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
On 22 February 2015 at 17:39, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org
mailto:jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
Whilst I agree with the goal of dropping support for old /
unmaintained
OpenSSL versions, in the case of OS X we probably need to map
Gingerbrad is using 1.0.0
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/openssl.git/+/gingerbread/openssl.version
First 1.0.1 was used in Jelly Bean
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/openssl.git/+/jb-mr0-release/openssl.version
So, for Android the minimum SSL version is
On 22 Feb 2015, at 18:50, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 06:42 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
On 22 February 2015 at 17:39, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
Whilst I agree with the goal of dropping support for old / unmaintained
OpenSSL versions, in the case
On 22 February 2015 at 20:08, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@theqtcompany.com
wrote:
On 22 Feb 2015, at 18:50, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 06:42 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
On 22 February 2015 at 17:39, Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org
wrote:
Whilst I agree
On 21 February 2015 at 18:38, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-21 22:05 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a while and was really only retained since it
is the only version apple ship on OS X (though they don't actually
recommend using it). Qt 5.5
2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a while and was really only retained since
it is the only version apple ship on OS
On 21 February 2015 at 18:30, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
Openssl 0.9.8 will reach EOL in December anyway. In addition to removing the
support from the sources, I suspect this will involve some changes to how
the library is searched for when we use dlopen.
As well as 1.0.0. Should we
On Saturday 21 February 2015 18:06:47 Richard Moore wrote:
On 21 February 2015 at 17:54, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2015 at 18:30, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
Openssl 0.9.8 will reach EOL in December anyway. In addition to removing
the
support
2015-02-21 22:05 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl
On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a while and
On Saturday 21 February 2015 22:38:03 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
The SecureTransport backend has been already introduced - that's a feature,
a dep. library version bump is not
Major behaviour change.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
24 matches
Mail list logo
