On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:01 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Hi Aleix,
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:43 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:28 AM Chris Adams
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Jonah,
>> >
>> > I'm not part of the Qt Company, so please consider my comments as
the goal is to make this more versatile with a package
manager solution.
Yours,
Tuukka
From: Development on behalf of Chris Adams
Date: Thursday, 6. May 2021 at 7.06
To: Aleix Pol
Cc: Qt Development List
Subject: Re: [Development] Status of the QtFeedback module
Hi Aleix
Hi Aleix,
Comments inline.
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:43 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:28 AM Chris Adams
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jonah,
> >
> > I'm not part of the Qt Company, so please consider my comments as
> discussion only ;-)
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of the QtFeedback modu
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:28 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Hi Jonah,
>
> I'm not part of the Qt Company, so please consider my comments as discussion
> only ;-)
>
> I'm the maintainer of the QtFeedback module, at least insofar as I am willing
> to review commits and keep things building. Sailfish O
Hi Chris,
Given that the rate of change in the repository is
so slow, why is packaging from git snapshot difficult in this case?
Distros are a bit hesitant to package git snapshots in general, as it
usually breaks their workflow for checking for a new upstream version.
The module being unrel
Hi Jonah,
I'm not part of the Qt Company, so please consider my comments as
discussion only ;-)
I'm the maintainer of the QtFeedback module, at least insofar as I am
willing to review commits and keep things building. Sailfish OS uses this
module, which is why I am still interested in keeping it
Hi,
I'm one of the people working on the Plasma Mobile project. We are using
the QtFeedback module, and it would be very useful for us to have a
release of the module, as packaging git snapshots is making life harder
than necessary for packagers. I'm aware the module is currently not
actively
