On quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2013 09:47:49, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> >>On sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2013 07:49:47, Koehne Kai wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we should have only:
> >>> + Reference Platforms
> >>> + Supported Platforms
> >>> + Platforms Reportedly Working
> This type of three tie
On 30.10.2013 9.33, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>On 25.10.13 09:57, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>
>>On sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2013 07:49:47, Koehne Kai wrote:
>>> I think we should have only:
>>> + Reference Platforms
>>> + Supported Platforms
>>> + Platforms Reportedly Working
>>
>>Makes sense to
On 25.10.13 09:57, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2013 07:49:47, Koehne Kai wrote:
>> I think we should have only:
>> + Reference Platforms
>> + Supported Platforms
>> + Platforms Reportedly Working
>
>Makes sense to me.
Yes, that sounds actually good. It¹s certainly
2013/10/29 Nicolás Alvarez :
> 2013/10/25 Koehne Kai :
>> Tier 2 would be e.g. Visual Studio 2008 (don't know actually, does anybody
>> test?)
>
> I tested it last month, build was broken in debug mode, I submitted
> patches. I just tested again and it seems nobody broke it again yet,
> still work
2013/10/25 Koehne Kai :
> Tier 2 would be e.g. Visual Studio 2008 (don't know actually, does anybody
> test?)
I tested it last month, build was broken in debug mode, I submitted
patches. I just tested again and it seems nobody broke it again yet,
still working :)
--
Nicolás
25, 2013 10:01 AM
> To: Koehne Kai; Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Where and how does Qt define which platforms
> are supported?
>
> On 10/25/2013 09:49 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> >
> > I think we should have only:
> > + Ref
On 10/25/2013 09:49 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
> I think we should have only:
> + Reference Platforms
> + Supported Platforms
> + Platforms Reportedly Working
>
> Regards
>
> Kai
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt
On sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2013 07:49:47, Koehne Kai wrote:
> I think we should have only:
> + Reference Platforms
> + Supported Platforms
> + Platforms Reportedly Working
Makes sense to me.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technol
ect: Re: [Development] Where and how does Qt define which platforms
> are supported?
>
> [...]
> At best, we can talk about what the trend is. For example, we can reasonably
> expect right now that Qt 5.2 will have QNX/BB10, Linux/X11, Windows, OS X,
> and Android as Tier 1, and
On quinta-feira, 24 de outubro de 2013 22:59:37, André Pönitz wrote:
> And half of the problem is unsolved. From a Qt user's perspective there's
> quite some difference between "Tier 2 - happens to work now, but is left to
> rot and die" and "Tier 2 - intended to be Tier 1, but fumbled at the
> lat
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40:16PM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2013 22:30:28, André Pönitz wrote:
> > One point that seems to be missing in these considerations is a clearly
> > communicated distinction between "actual state" and "intended state".
> >
> > The
On quarta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2013 22:30:28, André Pönitz wrote:
> One point that seems to be missing in these considerations is a clearly
> communicated distinction between "actual state" and "intended state".
>
> The use of "Tier" currently sems to close to "actual" state, and "reference
> p
On 22 October 2013 15:33, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> The purpose of this email is not to point out something what is not done or
> wrong. The purpose of this email to initiate a discussion and a work to get
> this done and create a clear definition where Qt runs on and how related
> platforms a
On 23 October 2013 22:30, André Pönitz
wrote:
> One point that seems to be missing in these considerations is a clearly
> communicated distinction between "actual state" and "intended state".
>
> The use of "Tier" currently sems to close to "actual" state, and "reference
> platform" close to "int
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:38:32AM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 13:33:04, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> > Finally, a search over emails on the dev list
> > (site:lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development) brings more
> > classifications/proposals:
> > http://li
On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 13:33:04, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> Finally, a search over emails on the dev list
> (site:lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development) brings more
> classifications/proposals:
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-November/007876.html
>
> The
On 22 October 2013 15:33, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> during one of the last release meetings, we had a chat about "Tier 1" or
> reference platforms. I mentioned that IMHO the "Tier 1" notion known in Qt
> prior Qt5 is not used in Qt5 anymore. I was not able to provide references
> of
Hi all,
during one of the last release meetings, we had a chat about "Tier 1" or
reference platforms. I mentioned that IMHO the "Tier 1" notion known in Qt
prior Qt5 is not used in Qt5 anymore. I was not able to provide references off
the top of my head, and now I took some time to collect refe
18 matches
Mail list logo
