Re: [Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-29 Thread Rutledge Shawn
libX11 also ends up being linked into the eglfs platform plugin. Even when configured with -no-xcb. I must be missing something, otherwise how could any of the non-X11 embedded or Raspberry Pi stuff work… Of course you can build on a machine that doesn't have the libs or headers available; I

Re: [Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-29 Thread Thomas Senyk
On Friday, 29 August, 2014 7:09:55 Rutledge Shawn wrote: libX11 also ends up being linked into the eglfs platform plugin. Even when configured with -no-xcb. There is a xcb backend (eglfshooks) for X11 .. maybe they have been selected for some reason? I must be missing something, otherwise

[Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-28 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
All, I'm building the latest from dev branch using the following options (on 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04): -opensource -confirm-license -developer-build -release -no-gui -no-widgets -no-cups -no-dbus -no-xcb However the build fails with the following message: The test for linking against libxcb and

Re: [Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-28 Thread Donald Carr
Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under loved and makes several demented assumptions which go largely unaddressed. Ideally everyone would scratch their own itch apropos the configure script, so if you remove this assumption and upstream it, maybe one day it will be a

Re: [Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-28 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
Yes, I feel the lack of love too! :) I'll open a bug to track it (and possibly fix it if I get time). -mandeep On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Donald Carr sirsp...@gmail.com wrote: Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under loved and makes several demented

Re: [Development] Why is libxcb needed if GUI is disabled in build?

2014-08-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 28 August 2014 16:21:27 Donald Carr wrote: Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under loved and makes several demented assumptions which go largely unaddressed. under loved is an understatement. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com