On fredag 18. januar 2019 14:26:50 CET Simon Hausmann wrote:
> I’m a fan of the idea that for Qt6 we remove all copies of third party
> libraries and provide convenient binaries of them in the qt installed (as
> separate package in there) as well as via vcpkg for those wanting to build
> from
Den fre 18 jan. 2019 kl 17:47 skrev Kai Koehne :
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development On Behalf Of
> > [...]
> > Would it make sense to use a package manager like Conan to provide third
> > party dependencies as well as Qt modules in source and prebuilt binary form?
> > That
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> [...]
> Would it make sense to use a package manager like Conan to provide third
> party dependencies as well as Qt modules in source and prebuilt binary form?
> That could solve the availability issue and would probably simplify the
On Friday, 18 January 2019, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> On 1/18/19 2:26 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >
> > I’m a fan of the idea that for Qt6 we remove all copies of third party
> > libraries and provide convenient binaries of them in the qt installed (as
> > separate package in there) as well as
On 1/18/19 2:26 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> I’m a fan of the idea that for Qt6 we remove all copies of third party
> libraries and provide convenient binaries of them in the qt installed (as
> separate package in there) as well as via vcpkg for those wanting to build
> from source.
>
> Flex
> On 18 Jan 2019, at 14:26, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
>
> I’m a fan of the idea that for Qt6 we remove all copies of third party
> libraries and provide convenient binaries of them in the qt installed (as
> separate package in there) as well as via vcpkg for those wanting to build
> from
I’m a fan of the idea that for Qt6 we remove all copies of third party
libraries and provide convenient binaries of them in the qt installed (as
separate package in there) as well as via vcpkg for those wanting to build from
source.
Flex and bison are IMO exactly the same kind of third party
t.org
>> Subject: [Development] gnuwin32 in qt5.git
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to have some opinions about the gnuwin32 we currently have in
>> qt5.git. This way we provide flex and bison for Windows.
>
> I forget... what do we use flex and bison for i
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Frederik Gladhorn
> Sent: Friday, 18 January 2019 2:09 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] gnuwin32 in qt5.git
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to have some opinions about the gnuwi
Hi all,
I'd like to have some opinions about the gnuwin32 we currently have in
qt5.git. This way we provide flex and bison for Windows.
I think it's a bit mis-placed, in my opinion the tools which are needed on
Windows should be in their own sub-module.
I think we should continue to ship them
10 matches
Mail list logo
