> On 10 May 2023, at 07:39, Marc Mutz via Development
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> That said. I find discussing style-guides in general a waste of time, and
>> will
>> agree to anything that make us stop wasting time on this.
>
> I tend to agree, but the choice is either to define it centrally, or you
On 09.05.23 22:15, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2023 08:51:37 CEST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
[...]
>> - space after template and before <:
>>
>> // WRONG
>> template
>> // CORRECT:
>> template
>>
>
>> Rationale: We always used the latter in Qt.
>
>
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2023 08:51:37 CEST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the following clarifications:
>
> - no space between "operator" and it's symbol:
>
> // WRONG
> bool operator ==()
> // CORRECT
> bool operator==()
>
> Rationale:
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:51:37AM +, Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the following clarifications:
>
> - no space between "operator" and it's symbol:
> [...]
> - exactly one space each between if and constexpr/constinit and
> [...]
> - space after template
Hi!
+1 to all suggestions
Best regards,
Ivan
From: Development on behalf of Marc Mutz
via Development
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 8:51 AM
To: qt-dev
Subject: [Development] Proposing changes to https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style
Hi,
I'd like to propose the
On Monday, 8 May 2023 23:51:37 PDT Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>// WRONG
>template
>// CORRECT:
>template
>
> Rationale: We always used the latter in Qt. Then a faulty _clang-format
> that dropped the space for unknown reasons was added to qt5.git and
> since then, we have a
Hello!
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Marc Mutz via Development
> Sent: tirsdag 9. mai 2023 08:52
> To: qt-dev
> Subject: [Development] Proposing changes to
> https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the following clarifications:
>
>
> - drop the requirement for () in lambdas
>
> Rationale: this was a word-around for older MSVCs. The standard doesn't
> require the empty parameter list (except when adorning the lambda with
> noexcept etc, and then the compiler complains) and people have voted
> with their feet: we now have
