Hi,
>
> === Protobuf ===
>
> * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> ** plugin to protoc?
IMHO flatbuffers (https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/) has quite a few
advantages over protocol buffers (one that I really like is that the only
dependency your app has is a single .h file,
On Tuesday 12 June 2018 00:41:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 11 June 2018 22:50:09 CEST Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> > Would it also make sense to explore msgpack? https://msgpack.org/
>
> No. Msgpack is the older version of CBOR, which we already have.
CBOR is IMHO better than Message
On Monday, 11 June 2018 22:50:09 CEST Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> Would it also make sense to explore msgpack? https://msgpack.org/
No. Msgpack is the older version of CBOR, which we already have.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
> > >
> > > === Protobuf ===
> > >
> > > * Need
On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
> >
> > === Protobuf ===
> >
> > * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> > ** plugin to protoc?
> >
> > About protobuf
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
>
> === Protobuf ===
>
> * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> ** plugin to protoc?
>
> About protobuf support in Qt, I have an old WIP change at
