On 17/10/15 01:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> FYI
>
> Please report any issues you have with broken compilers that did not
> implement
> std::atomic properly. I'd like to include them in the release notes.
>
> These are already known to fail, so please don't report them:
> - Xcode 5.0's clang
On Sunday 18 October 2015 00:59:32 Tim Blechmann wrote:
> On 17/10/15 01:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > FYI
> >
> > Please report any issues you have with broken compilers that did not
> > implement std::atomic properly. I'd like to include them in the release
> > notes.
> >
> > These are
On Saturday 17 October 2015 19:42:27 Bubke Marco wrote:
> > Last time I profiled Qt Creator startup and parsing of projects, the two
> > most expensive calls in QtCore were qHash and the SHA1 calculator. The
> > former I've already fixed. The latter I was hoping that some colleagues
> > would fix
On Saturday 17 October 2015 08:06:33 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > The word 'fanboys' disturbs me (I know you don't mean it that way) because
> > there are no 'hard' numbers on how 'bad' the current situation really is.
> > It would really be helpful to have an idea how 'real-world' applications
> > suffer
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Monday 21 September 2015 11:05:52 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> QDesktopWidget::primaryScreenChanged signal
>> -> IMO this should be added as NOTIFY to the corresponding property.
>
> The signal is missing the int argument
>
>
Hi Marc
They thread mostly concentrated on performance but what about statical
analysis? string_view and array_view are specifically designed for that. Maybe
you mention it already but how is QStringView working for it.
Sent from cellphone
___
>Please understand my POV: I am of the firm belief that Qt has no business
>creating inefficiencies for its users by sloppy implementation. Anywhere.
I think you are overreacting here, way too much. You have discovered a more
efficient way to handle strings, but that doesn't mean Trolltech
On Saturday 17 October 2015 15:51:35 Smith Martin wrote:
> >Please understand my POV: I am of the firm belief that Qt has no business
> >creating inefficiencies for its users by sloppy implementation. Anywhere.
>
> I think you are overreacting here, way too much. You have discovered a more
>
On October 17, 2015 19:22:55 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday 17 October 2015 08:06:33 Marc Mutz wrote:
>> > The word 'fanboys' disturbs me (I know you don't mean it that way) because
>> > there are no 'hard' numbers on how 'bad' the current situation really is.
>>
2015-10-17 8:58 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Saturday 17 October 2015 07:14:58 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > 2015-10-17 6:23 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> > > On Saturday 17 October 2015 03:34:51 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > > -
On October 17, 2015 21:05:29 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Saturday 17 October 2015 15:51:35 Smith Martin wrote:
>> >Please understand my POV: I am of the firm belief that Qt has no business
>> >creating inefficiencies for its users by sloppy implementation. Anywhere.
>>
>> I think
On October 17, 2015 15:52:08 Smith Martin wrote:
>>Please understand my POV: I am of the firm belief that Qt has no business
>>creating inefficiencies for its users by sloppy implementation. Anywhere.
>
> I think you are overreacting here, way too much. You have
12 matches
Mail list logo