Re: [Development] QtQuick Call for Maintainer

On 08/03/16 09:04, Nurmi J-P wrote: On 07 Mar 2016, at 20:45, Gunnar Sletta wrote: I would like to suggest Robin Burchell for the role of future Qt Quick maintainer. He is a long time Qt contributor and has repeatedly shown insight and dedication to the project. From

Re: [Development] QtQuick Call for Maintainer

> On 07 Mar 2016, at 20:45, Gunnar Sletta wrote: > > I would like to suggest Robin Burchell for the role of future Qt Quick > maintainer. > > He is a long time Qt contributor and has repeatedly shown insight and > dedication to the project. From various work he has solid

Re: [Development] Usage of Q_OBJECT macro in QObject subclasses that don't use signals, slots, or properties

Mitch asked: >> Is this worth mentioning in the documentation? Andre' P replied: > I think it would make sense to list the features that are affected so > that users can decide whether they actually need one of them, or not, > instead of having this unspecific (and untrue) "strange things may >

[Development] QNX broken on 5.7

Hello everyone, I would like to point out that QNX is unable to build the 5.7 branch. The commit that probably triggered the breakage is: d6bb01e1779f1840dfbab57c6ecd615587bbde62 Force inclusion of on QNX systems. This raises my first question: should this not have been reported by

Re: [Development] QNX broken on 5.7

Hi, When building Qt 5.7 for QNX a special patch is applied in the CI that fixes the Dinkumware headers. You were CCed when this was discussed (Subject was "‎QNX and Dinkumware support for constexpr and nullptr"). Simon Original Message From: Rafael Roquetto Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Re: [Development] QNX broken on 5.7

Hi Simon, You are right, I completely forgot about that thread. Thanks for the feedback. Cheers, Rafael On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:31:15PM +, Hausmann Simon wrote: > Hi, > > When building Qt 5.7 for QNX a special patch is applied in the CI that fixes > the Dinkumware headers. You were

Re: [Development] QNX broken on 5.7

No worries :). The fact that you didn't see a proper configure error message suggests that the follow up patch to verify the qnx installation didn't make it or is buggy. Hmm. Simon Original Message From: Rafael Roquetto Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 19:48 To: Hausmann Simon Cc:

Re: [Development] QNX broken on 5.7

On terça-feira, 8 de março de 2016 18:59:51 PST Hausmann Simon wrote: > No worries :). The fact that you didn't see a proper configure error message > suggests that the follow up patch to verify the qnx installation didn't > make it or is buggy. Hmm. Indeed, it's change