[Development] [Announce] t Design Studio 3.9.0 released

We released Qt Design Studio 3.9.0 today, see https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-design-studio-3.9-released Best Regards, Thomas Hartmann ___ Announce mailing list annou...@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/announce

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Hm: "Apple are incorrectly reporting Big Sur 11 as Catalin 10.15. You can read more about it here. We can't correctly show usage for Big Sur 11 or Catalina 10.15 until Apple fixes this." Looks like WebKit doesn't report anything larger than 10.15.

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

coroberti wrote: > Since Qt 6.5 drops Mac OS 10.15 Catalina, > it apparently starts to be irrelevant for at least 95% of Mac Desktops. > > https://gs.statcounter.com/macos-version-market-share/desktop/worldwide See the note on top: | Apple are incorrectly reporting Big Sur 11 as Catalin 10.15.

[Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Hi, Since Qt 6.5 drops Mac OS 10.15 Catalina, it apparently starts to be irrelevant for at least 95% of Mac Desktops. https://gs.statcounter.com/macos-version-market-share/desktop/worldwide Google Analytics data of visitors for some web-site, where I have access, also supports the above

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

On Friday, 16 December 2022 09:41:11 -03 Kevin Kofler via Development wrote: > And Google Analytics also reads the information from the user agent, so it > is almost certainly affected by the same Safari "feature". And the WebKit > "bug" (actually a "feature" request asking to introduce the

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

On Friday, 16 December 2022 09:20:44 -03 coroberti wrote: > Hi, > Since Qt 6.5 drops Mac OS 10.15 Catalina, > it apparently starts to be irrelevant for at least 95% of Mac Desktops. Please note the problem is that *Apple* dropped 10.15 earlier this year. Its last security release was already

[Development] Updates to QUIP-6: Acceptable Source-Incompatible changes

Hi, The recent episode with qVersion() moving from qglobal.h to qlibraryinfo.h, a header not included in qglobal.h, has shown that QUIP-6 SiC A are too broad a category. As per QUIP-6, I'm proposing to add a new entry to the table that bans moving definitions from one header to another if the

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

On Friday, 16 December 2022 18:15:11 -03 Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > But why did you do this? Does the supporting of 10.15 really increase > the development cost for Qt Company? I can't speak for the Qt Company costs, particularly for the fact that this is one of their LTS releases. But in

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Some Mac users probably will stick with 10.14 Mojave for years, since it's the last version to support 32-bit apps. Even if Apple doesn't update it, it will have some lingering share, e.g. to run Adobe apps from the desktop rather than Creative Cloud. On top of that, the last couple of MacOS