[Development] Qt 6.6 initial schedule (was: Proposal: let's change the release schedules a bit)

2023-02-14 Thread Jani Heikkinen via Development
Hi all, It seems there isn't that much support to change the release schedule frame so let's keep the old one & plan new minor releases in March & September. So my proposal for Qt 6.6 schedule is: * Qt 6.6 Platform and Module freeze 19.5.2023 * Qt 6.6 Feature Freeze 2.6.2023 * Qt 6.6 Beta1

[Development] Help me, check bug Qt topic 142770, very urgent!

2023-02-14 Thread g . scarpelli
Hello, Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion with topic 142770 ? Name topic : The touch screen events are block after deleteLater function Best regards, Gianmarco Scarpelli [microtechsrl_1486503464_F.png] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

Re: [Development] Help me, check bug Qt topic 142770, very urgent!

2023-02-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:38:43AM +0100, g.scarpe...@u-tech.it wrote: > Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion > with topic 142770 ? This is a community mailinglist, which is the wrong place to get "very urgent" help with a non-public bug. Most people here (me

Re: [Development] Help me, check bug Qt topic 142770, very urgent!

2023-02-14 Thread g . scarpelli
Hi Florian , I send you my problem : I am development my application with the qt 5.15 (c++ code) .The my application is implement using objects are child of the QWidget class. Every time that I open a child class connect the closing signal at the slot to parent class to delete the

[Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
Hi all, Having taken part in various third-party updates and felt a need to leave notes for those who will do the same in future, I have run up against JSON not having a comment format. To work round that, I propose to allow some fields to be included in a qt_attribution.json file for that

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Kai Köhne via Development
Hi Eddy, > -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Edward Welbourne via Development > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 3:14 PM > To: Development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in > qt_attributions.json files > > Hi all,

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Ivan Solovev via Development
Hi, +1 to the approach suggested by Kai. Having comments would be very helpful, but I do not think that we need a separate comment field for each entry. Best regards, Ivan From: Development on behalf of Kai Köhne via Development Sent: Tuesday, February 14,

[Development] Meeting minutes from Qt Release Team meeting 14.2.2023

2023-02-14 Thread Jani Heikkinen via Development
Qt 6.5 status - Qt 6.5 beta3 preparations ongoing * Content not frozen yet but target is to freeze it as soon as possible * Target is to release Qt 6.5.0 beta3 at the beginning of next week - Qt 6.5 API Change review mostly done, see

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Kai Köhne via Development
> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of Ulf > Hermann via Development > Subject: Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in > qt_attributions.json files > > YAML is really quite terrible. If we're going to switch, let's choose > something > else. > >

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 07:07:00 PST Kai Köhne via Development wrote: > First, let's agree that JSON sucks for the task at hand. It doesn't have any > explicit support for comments, and no support for multi-line strings > (though our implementation tolerates this). How about switching to

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

2023-02-14 Thread Ulf Hermann via Development
YAML is really quite terrible. If we're going to switch, let's choose something else. Basically, YAML is extremely complex, ambiguous, and incompatible between different versions. See for example https://ruudvanasseldonk.com/2023/01/11/the-yaml-document-from-hell for an in-depth explanation.