Qt 6.6 status:
* Qt 6.6.1 release preparations are ongoing
* Branching from '6.6' to '6.6.1' will happen Tue 14th of November
* Target is to release Qt 6.6.1 Thu 23rd of November
Qt 6.7 status:
* Platform and module freeze -milestone will be in effect 24th of November
On Tuesday, 7 November 2023 13:34:04 PST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> > Yes. Remember that "one binary" is the process as loaded into memory,
> > including all the libraries. Depending on compilation modes, inline
> > functions may be merged from multiple independent libraries at runtime.
>
On 07.11.23 20:12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 November 2023 06:28:51 PST Ivan Solovev via Development wrote:
[...]
>> The main reason to use `auto` is that it will allow us to avoid unnecessary
>> `std::*_ordering -> Q*Ordering -> std::*_ordering` conversions in the C++20
>> case,
On Tuesday, 7 November 2023 09:07:10 PST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> To be clear: This is not about Qt compiled with C++17 used in projects
> compiled with C++20. This is about one .cpp file being compiled with
> C++17 and another .cpp file from, broadly speaking, the same cmake
> target,
On Tuesday, 7 November 2023 06:28:51 PST Ivan Solovev via Development wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to discuss one more topic regarding the C++20 comparison.
>
> Can we allow an `auto` return type in helper functions and the three-way
> comparison implementation for the built-in types?
Answering
Hi,
thanks, QFont::PreferFullHinting seems to do the trick.
I actually had that set for testing and thought
QTextOption::setDesignMetrics(false) was the fix (after reading a bit of
QFontEngineFT) but it was the hinting all along :-)
Thanks!
Cheers Kai Uwe
Am 06.11.23 um 12:04 schrieb
On 07.11.23 15:28, Ivan Solovev via Development wrote:
>
> So, my question is - shoud we support mixing C++17 and C++20 in one binary?
To be clear: This is not about Qt compiled with C++17 used in projects
compiled with C++20. This is about one .cpp file being compiled with
C++17 and another
Hi,
I'd like to discuss one more topic regarding the C++20 comparison.
Can we allow an `auto` return type in helper functions and the three-way
comparison implementation for the built-in types?
The idea is that these methods can return `Q*Ordering` types in C++17 mode, and
`std::*_ordering`
Alex Blasche (6 November 2023 15:55) wrote:
> Qt GRPC and Qt Protobuf were added to Qt a while ago. However until
> now they have been in Tech Preview mode. As we investigate the
> remaining issues which might prevent us from leaving TP, we need to
> address the open issue of maintainer-ship.
>
>
