Re: [Development] Proposing Matt Vogt for Approver Status

2012-01-09 Thread bill.king
Another +1 here. --     Bill King     Lead Test Engineer     Nokia, Qt Creator team     http://qt.nokia.com -Original Message- From: development-bounces+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext

Re: [Development] QFile: writing via a temporary file

2012-01-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:04:56PM -0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: Moreover, filesystems on Linux (at least) are tuned so that, if the renaming is recorded, the data was too. There was an issue with early ext4 that those were not synchronised: the writing of the rename happened up to 30

Re: [Development] QFile: writing via a temporary file

2012-01-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:13:00PM -0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday, 6 de January de 2012 21.27.20, David Faure wrote: Exception handling is a new argument though. But doesn't the current QFile have the exact same issue then? You start writing, throw an exception, dtor calls

[Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, I've just solved a problem with a method called check() on Mac OSX. It was quite a head scratcher, so I thought I'd throw some light on it so others are aware. Mac OSX defines an assert header called check() so I was getting error like:

Re: [Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Charley Bay
Stephen Kelly spaketh: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-with-Darwin-Mac-gcc-4-0-1- td2580330.html So, keep in mind - for portability treat 'check' as an out of bounds name for a method or variable. Thiago Macieira respondeth: Also to avoid: sun m_volume

Re: [Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 9 de January de 2012 14.46.54, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gábor?= Lehel wrote: Yet more: - major - minor These are defined to gnu_dev_major and gnu_dev_minor, I'm not quite sure by what (GCC? glibc?). /usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h:# define major(dev) gnu_dev_major (dev) $ grep

Re: [Development] When is Qt 4.8 in Gerrit? (Was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2012-01-09 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Thanks! And also the 393 task seems to be updated today to reflect this. Yours, -- Tuukka Turunen Director, Qt Commercial RD Digia Plc Piippukatu 11, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland Visit us at: www.digia.com or qt.digia.com On 9.1.2012 16.12, Sergio Ahumada sergio.ahum...@nokia.com wrote:

Re: [Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Gábor Lehel
2012/1/9 Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com: Perhaps we could use GCC's poison pragma[1] to make sure that no one uses them? In some cases it would just be replacing one error message with another (though perhaps a more user-friendly one), but in other cases it would substitute an error for no

Re: [Development] When is Qt 4.8 in Gerrit? (Was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2012-01-09 Thread Quim Gil
Hi Sergio, On 01/09/2012 06:12 AM, ext Sergio Ahumada wrote: Qt 4.x has been in Gerrit since 03/01/2012 https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTQAINFRA-432 Wow, such an awaited event went so unnoticed. The bug report is not that verbose either. Can you or someone write a blog post that we

Re: [Development] fixing name of QNetworkAccessManager::createRequest

2012-01-09 Thread Piotr Dobrogost
Giuseppe D'Angelo dangelog at gmail.com writes: Being an API break, do you see any good motivation to justify it? Yes, it can only be done in new major version. When if not now? (I agree that the method name is wrong since it creates the reply, but breaking software just because doesn't

Re: [Development] fixing name of QNetworkAccessManager::createRequest

2012-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 9 de January de 2012 18.46.01, Piotr Dobrogost wrote: Giuseppe D'Angelo dangelog at gmail.com writes: Being an API break, do you see any good motivation to justify it? Yes, it can only be done in new major version. When if not now? Never. (I agree that the method name is wrong

Re: [Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Gábor Lehel
2012/1/9 Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com: On Monday, January 09, 2012 18:00:29 Gábor Lehel wrote: 2012/1/9 Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com: Perhaps we could use GCC's poison pragma[1] to make sure that no one uses them? In some cases it would just be replacing one error message

Re: [Development] check, Mate!

2012-01-09 Thread Gábor Lehel
2012/1/9 Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com: 2012/1/9 Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com: On Monday, January 09, 2012 18:00:29 Gábor Lehel wrote: 2012/1/9 Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com: Perhaps we could use GCC's poison pragma[1] to make sure that no one uses them? In some cases it

Re: [Development] When is Qt 4.8 in Gerrit? (Was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2012-01-09 Thread lars.knoll
On 1/9/12 6:09 PM, ext Quim Gil quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi Sergio, On 01/09/2012 06:12 AM, ext Sergio Ahumada wrote: Qt 4.x has been in Gerrit since 03/01/2012 https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTQAINFRA-432 Wow, such an awaited event went so unnoticed. The bug report is not that

Re: [Development] QLatin1Constant and QtContacts / QtOrganizer

2012-01-09 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:17:20 Thiago Macieira wrote: str = QString::fromLatin1(%1 %2).arg(foo, bar); reason: QString::fromLatin1 will need to allocate memory use: QStringLiteral I looked into QStringLiteral by the way. It has no arg() methods,