Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

2012-04-24 Thread techabc
1. Does the beta will coming in end of this month aka. April ? 2. Is there binary packages with this upcoming beta ? 2012/4/16 Rohan McGovern rohan.mcgov...@nokia.com: jason.mcdon...@nokia.com said: Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how often those insignificant

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta: Documentation

2012-04-24 Thread casper.vandonderen
Hi, I just cut out the rest of the email for clarity. (great that you would want to help) I just want to talk about the inherits and inherited by problem. Inherits should always work, because you compile the Qt code that way (you cannot subclass a class that doesn't exist yet). I just want to

[Development] Qt Playground - Mock add-on module

2012-04-24 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I would like to work on a Mock add-on module in Qt Playground that might be beneficial later for certain projects. See the relevant wikipage for a short introduction about the goals of mock objects in testing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mock_object Here you can find similar projects and

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

2012-04-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 24 de abril de 2012 14.48.10, techabc wrote: 1. Does the beta will coming in end of this month aka. April ? No, probably a few weeks more. 2. Is there binary packages with this upcoming beta ? That's the idea. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software

Re: [Development] Suggested improvements to JIRA

2012-04-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 24 de abril de 2012 03.22.40, mark.k...@nokia.com wrote: - We'll ask the subcons doing JIRA admin to get https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugins/org.openmrs.jira.plugins.autowatchjir a installed in the Sandbox and test if it is suitable for this task. That should provide a

[Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
Since Qt 3 days[1], QString::fromAscii has stood for from C strings with Ascii standing for that which the developer writes, instead of its proper definition of US-ASCII, a.k.a. ANSI X3.4-1986. By default, it was Latin 1 in Qt 3 and Qt 4. In addition, QTextCodec::setCodecForCStrings could be used

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread Robin Burchell
2012/4/24 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: My recommendation is a variant of options 3: we document that it accepts only US-ASCII and that it has undefined behaviour when the input isn't US-ASCII compliant. That way, we can make it be equal to toLatin1() and avoid having to write

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread BRM
- Original Message - From: Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net 2012/4/24 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: My recommendation is a variant of options 3: we document that it accepts only US-ASCII and that it has undefined behaviour when the input isn't US-ASCII

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 24 de abril de 2012 15.36.24, Olivier Goffart wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 14:27:10 Thiago Macieira wrote: The question I have is: what shall we do with QString::fromAscii? My personal preference would be to deprecate it. The name is confusing compared to the others that

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 24 de abril de 2012 07.33.41, BRM wrote: Question: is there are reason not to support the US-Extended ASCII (128-255)? I know it's not used often, but sometimes those characters are very useful. There's no such encoding. The use of the term is sometimes criticized, because it

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread kai.koehne
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Thiago Macieira Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:54 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development]

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread 1+1=2
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:01 AM, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: There's no use in 'fixing' fromAscii(), toAscii() if we're deprecating it anyway (which I support). So just let it be a synonym to fromLatin1(), toLatin1(), which it was by default anyway in Qt4. I like the idea.

Re: [Development] QString::fromAscii toAscii's future

2012-04-24 Thread Loaden
There's no use in 'fixing' fromAscii(), toAscii() if we're deprecating it anyway (which I support). So just let it be a synonym to fromLatin1(), toLatin1(), which it was by default anyway in Qt4. I think this is a good idea. 2012/4/24 kai.koe...@nokia.com -Original Message-

Re: [Development] The place of QML

2012-04-24 Thread alan.alpert
From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [gir...@forwardbias.in] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:50 PM To: Donald Carr Cc: Alpert Alan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] The place of QML I do think we should evaluate exposing the QML implementations to C++ for 5.1.

Re: [Development] The place of QML

2012-04-24 Thread alan.alpert
From: development-bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext d3fault [d3faultdot...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:33 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] The place of QML I

Re: [Development] The place of QML

2012-04-24 Thread Girish Ramakrishnan
Hi Alan, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:16 AM, alan.alp...@nokia.com wrote: From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [gir...@forwardbias.in] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:50 PM To: Donald Carr Cc: Alpert Alan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] The place of QML I do