Hi,
We are happy to announce that Qt 5 beta 2 is available for download at
http://qt-project.org/downloads.
More information about the release can be found at the blog post:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/11/13/qt-5-0-beta-2-is-out/ and at
http://qt-project.org/
Looking forward to seeing
Hi,
Since there hasn't been strong objections against the list I updated the page
(starting with a more general note that Windows, Linux and Mac OS X are the
supported platforms, as Thiago suggested) : http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5 .
That doesn't mean though that we can't extend it further
Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit.
Really? I would assume that 32-bit is still a significantly-large
audience that we could *add* 64-bit, but that we likely would need to
keep 32-bit (for a while).
Have developers really
On terça-feira, 13 de novembro de 2012 07.02.40, Charley Bay wrote:
Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit.
Really? I would assume that 32-bit is still a significantly-large
audience that we could *add* 64-bit, but that we
From: Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com
Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit. Problems I see is that we don't test it
right now in the CI system, and that e.g. qtwebkit has currently problems on
windows 64 bit.
Agree
On 13 Nov 2012, at 14:17, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
Since there hasn't been strong objections against the list I updated the page
(starting with a more general note that Windows, Linux and Mac OS X are the
supported platforms, as Thiago suggested) :
Win8 support would be nice to add, but please do not drop WinXP.
MS may be dropping official, public support for WinXP in 2014; but it will
still be around for a very long time.
Ben
Are you referring to XP for embedded? (which survives until 2016)
I'd strongly advise anyone not to use a
On 7 Nov 2012, at 1:26 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kate Alhola kate.alh...@gmail.com wrote:
There are no longer ANY mobile platform among Tier-1 platforms at all.
linux-arm7-gcc-wayland Linux, ARM7, Wayland. To be specified in more detail
can be MeeGo/SailFish
Hi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rutledge Shawn
shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote:
Well it's so uncommon to do builds right on the ARM platform, and maybe our
CI is not currently set up to cross-compile on one platform and run tests on
another? But it's probably possible to do with a few
From: shane.kea...@accenture.com shane.kea...@accenture.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1
platforms
Win8 support would be nice to add, but please do not drop WinXP.
MS may be dropping official, public
Compiling on the target is very unusual, and slow. Crosscompiling +
running tests on qemu looks like a better option IMHO.
The ubuntu-arm, arch-arm community and the like would say the opposite
(i.e. think of a powerful board like beagle). While scratchbox was also a
cross-compilation
11 matches
Mail list logo
