[Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/ hierarchy. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.asc

[Development] module documentation

2012-11-27 Thread Lorn Potter
Hi, Since modules/add-ons were 'removed' from qt.pro the documentation is missing from qt-project.org meaning no one can even find out about them. Do a search for one of their classes and they show up in the results, but the documents are missing. I know it was easiest to just remove these

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Nurmi J-P
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: 27. marraskuuta 2012 7:55 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] repository for the

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: Hello We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/ hierarchy. Maybe this is the long awaited return of a now public

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Knoll Lars
On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Nurmi J-P jpnu...@digia.com wrote: -Original Message- From: development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: 27. marraskuuta 2012 7:55 To:

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Nurmi J-P
We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/ hierarchy. Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its dependency to qtbase? The goal was to not have any Qt dependencies, so

Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Updating Daemon/Service Support

2012-11-27 Thread Sascha Cunz
[...] The difference is that 'operate' and 'configure' are two different tasks and thus usually require two different interfaces. The 'operate' interface of an anti-malware service is to monitor data and network traffic. The 'configure' interface is most probably a seperate application

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:40:57 Simon Hausmann wrote: On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: Hello We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:40:57 Simon Hausmann wrote: On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new

Re: [Development] binary compatibility promise

2012-11-27 Thread Ziller Eike
On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com wrote: On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote: Peter Hartmann wrote: On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote: (...) The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in practice. Vendors of binary Qt based

Re: [Development] binary compatibility promise (was: Re: Frameworks on Mac?)

2012-11-27 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
23.11.2012, 14:07, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com: This situation is different on mobile (and I guess embedded as well); On embedded you usually can rebuild all software when changing Qt, so binary compatibility is not important. -- Regards, Konstantin

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:03:11 Nurmi J-P wrote: We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/ hierarchy. Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its dependency to qtbase?

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012 11.23.00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: qtchooser (i kinda like that) qtswitcher I like those two. So requesting it as qtchooser. I'll rename the tool to match the repository name. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect -

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Knoll Lars
qtchooser is ok for me. Sergio, can you help to create the repo, please? Thanks, Lars On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012 11.23.00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: qtchooser (i kinda like that) qtswitcher I like

Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Updating Daemon/Service Support

2012-11-27 Thread BRM
From: Lukas Geyer lge...@gmx.at Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Updating Daemon/Service Support Am 27.11.2012 11:03, schrieb Sascha Cunz: [...] The difference is that 'operate' and 'configure' are two different tasks and thus usually require two different interfaces. The

[Development] Can the QML Flickable component inherit from a MouseArea in Qt5?

2012-11-27 Thread Mark
Hi, I just opened this feature request [1] and usually i don't open another question for the same stuff on the development list. Guess this time is different ;) Considering that QtQuick 2.0 is very different compared to 1.1 i'm wondering if this late header change could be added by someone to

Re: [Development] binary compatibility promise

2012-11-27 Thread Tony Van Eerd
-Original Message- [mailto:development-bounces+tvaneerd=rim@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Ziller Eike On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com wrote: Do you intend to upgrade this version of Qt that's installed on the device without upgrading the

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Thiago A . Corrêa
Hi, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo. alternative naming ideas: qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive) qtchooser (i kinda like that) qtswitcher qtdispatcher qt-version-manager

Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper

2012-11-27 Thread Ahumada Sergio
ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtchooser.git should work now. -- Sergio Ahumada Quality Engineer - Digia, Qt From: Knoll Lars Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 15:20 To: Thiago Macieira Cc: development@qt-project.org; Ahumada Sergio Subject: Re:

Re: [Development] Can the QML Flickable component inherit from a MouseArea in Qt5?

2012-11-27 Thread Alan Alpert
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just opened this feature request [1] and usually i don't open another question for the same stuff on the development list. Guess this time is different ;) Even if this time is different, I'm still going to put my comments

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

2012-11-27 Thread Yang Fan
Any update? On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Yang Fan missd...@gmail.com wrote: Any update? On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Yang Fan missd...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I checked this issue on Windows 7, Mac OSX 10.6.8 and Ubuntu 12.10, only Windows version has this problem, so I indicated

[Development] QMake behaviour change

2012-11-27 Thread Johan Thelin
Hi all, I just wanted to highlight QTBUG-28011 [1]. I feel that this causes a number of problems: - Breaks old code, while only yielding warnings, which are then followed by hard to interpret linker errors - Means that source code where headers and sources are split into different directories

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

2012-11-27 Thread Hausmann Simon
Hi, If the issue appears only with QtWebKit on Windows but not with the same version on Mac or Linux/X11, then I think it is very unlikely that it can be resolved with a setting. These things should work out of the box with Qt (like you expect). It could be an issue in WebKit, maybe ICU or

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

2012-11-27 Thread Konstantin Ritt
OR this could be a result of using QRawFont backdoor :) @Fan Yang: did you file a bug? what is it's number? Konstantin 2012/11/28 Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.com: Hi, If the issue appears only with QtWebKit on Windows but not with the same version on Mac or Linux/X11, then I think