On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 09:38:24 AM Konstantin Ritt wrote:
OR this could be a result of using QRawFont backdoor :)
That wouldn't explain though why it works on Mac and Linux, no?
There are two code paths in WebKit, a fast text code path and one for complex
text (note how it's not
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
Sent: 27. november 2012 17:13
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development]
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I created a bug at https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTWEBKIT-383.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.comwrote:
Hi,
If the issue appears only with QtWebKit on Windows but not with the same
version on Mac or Linux/X11, then
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
different directories all of a sudden depends on relative paths to all
files
See VPATH, which Ossi already mentioned in the bug report.
- Behaves differently from QtCreator (tested with a rather old version
2.5.2).
What
Hello,
does anybody know something about a possiblity to use C# for programming Qt5
and Qt Quick?
I know this sounds funny :-)
With best regards,
Torsten Labs
Siemens AG
Industry Sector
Industry Automation Division
Industrial Automation Systems
Factory Automation
On 2012-11-28, Labs, Torsten torsten.l...@siemens.com wrote:
Hello,
does anybody know something about a possiblity to use C# for programming Qt=
5 and Qt Quick?
I know this sounds funny :-)
I would expect the people behind Qyoto (Qt4 mono bindings) will move on
to Qt 5 sometime in the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com wrote:
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
different directories all of a sudden depends on relative paths to all
files
See VPATH, which Ossi already mentioned in the bug report.
yup, will do.
On Wednesday 28 Nov 2012 13:17:58 Johan Thelin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com
wrote:
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
different directories all of a sudden depends on relative paths to all
files
See VPATH,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 28 Nov 2012 13:17:58 Johan Thelin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com
wrote:
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
different
Nope, but I guess that a common interpretation of pro-files between
qmake and QtCreator are of interest to most.
You need contemporary versions of Qt Creator for use with recent versions of Qt.
Andre'
___
Development mailing list
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:17:58PM +0100, Johan Thelin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com wrote:
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
different directories all of a sudden depends on relative paths to all
files
See
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:17:58PM +0100, Johan Thelin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com
wrote:
- Means that source code where headers and sources are split into
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Poenitz Andre andre.poen...@digia.com wrote:
Nope, but I guess that a common interpretation of pro-files between
qmake and QtCreator are of interest to most.
You need contemporary versions of Qt Creator for use with recent versions of
Qt.
Verified with a
Maybe you can create a my.qdocconf.in file, then let qmake generating
proper my.qdocconf file for you.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Denis Shienkov scap...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hello, Qt developers.
Why not available Qt env variables from *.qdocconf file?
For example,
I need specify path
Hello,
is there a possibility to add the current help for Qt5.0-snapshot in a self
compiled Qt Creator with Qt5 Libs. At the moment if i press F1 i get allways
No Documentation available.
Thx.
With best regards,
Torsten Labs
Siemens AG
Industry Sector
Industry Automation Division
Industrial
From: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Updating Daemon/Service Support
From: Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Updating Daemon/Service Support
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:48
It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before
deciding on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise. I'm not a
native myself but I can tell this sounds wrong. 'Chose' is definitely not
the right verb here, you probably wanted 'select' instead?
On top of that, IMO the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:56:08PM +0100, Labs, Torsten wrote:
Hello,
is there a possibility to add the current help for Qt5.0-snapshot in a self
compiled Qt Creator with Qt5 Libs. At the moment if i press F1 i get allways
No Documentation available.
If you have a (_really_) recent build
On quarta-feira, 28 de novembro de 2012 17.43.18, Knoll Lars wrote:
The repository is now created, so I'd rather not change that (as that's a
hazzle in gerrit). But we can still choose freely how to call the binary.
Nobody apart from a few developers and packagers will ever see the
repository
On 28 November 2012 18:35, Romain Pokrzywka romain.pokrzy...@gmail.com wrote:
It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before
deciding on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise. I'm not a
native myself but I can tell this sounds wrong. 'Chose' is definitely not
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:35:40AM -0800, Romain Pokrzywka wrote:
It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before deciding
on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise.
Is it?
But even if so, most of the target audience are not native speakers
of English either...
On 29/11/2012, at 5:47 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
If maintainers for other repositories would like to get the same branches
setup, please speak up and tell Sergio and Janne. Both have agreed to do most
of the actual work of creating the branches in gerrit and setting up the
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:58 AM, d3fault d3faultdot...@gmail.com wrote:
The words stable and release are somewhat ambiguous (enough to
warrant change).
A release is implicitly stable, so the converse usually also holds
true: stable is released.
Not really. IMO, stable should be an always
always close to releasable = testing
-dev
-testing
-release or stable
eradicates any chance of confusion, regardless of who is right
d3fault
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Hi all,
Attached is a patch that makes qt4 work with long building path.
If qt4 is integrated into other projects, in my case, Yocto, it's likely
that the 256 length limit of its building path is not enough. See more
details in attachment.
Sorry if I'm sending this to the wrong ML. (If so,
Hi all,
Attached is a patch that makes qt4 work with long building path.
If qt4 is integrated into other projects, in my case, Yocto, it's likely
that the 256 length limit of its building path is not enough. See more
details in attachment.
Sorry if I'm sending this to the wrong ML. (If so,
Hi, Chen Qi,
Glad to see your contribution. But in qt-project era, maybe you could
contribute it to Qt via open governance way.
Reference:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/01/10/qt-4-moved-to-open-governance/
http://qt-project.org/contribute
And if you are Chinese, maybe you could also try
I agree with d3fault on this one.
On 29/11/2012 1:07 PM, d3fault wrote:
always close to releasable = testing
-dev
-testing
-release or stable
eradicates any chance of confusion, regardless of who is right
d3fault
___
Development mailing list
28 matches
Mail list logo
