On 3/6/13 8:23 PM, "Alan Alpert" <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Olivier Goffart
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> This is not a warning, this is an error in C++
>>>
>>> enum Foo { A , B };
>>> Foo bar = 1; // error: invalid
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem with a warning on the console is that these are emitted
> every time the application runs. So if you've written your application
> correctly and are happy with it, the user shouldn't be seeing the
> console flo
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 11:23:49 Alan Alpert wrote:
[...]
> We can't have explicit casts because the scripts are in JavaScript,
> which is dynamically typed.
Yes. Considering that, I guess implicit cast are ok.
But don't pretend it is to match C++ :-)
--
Olivier
Woboq - Qt services and supp
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>>
>> This is not a warning, this is an error in C++
>>
>> enum Foo { A , B };
>> Foo bar = 1; // error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to ‘Foo’
>> int blah = bar; // No warning. unless you
On 4 March 2013 20:41, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> What exactly do you want to use TBB for?
>
> Can we not just suggest users to use TBB directly? And just make sure Qt play
> nice with it.
>
> Or do you want to make a wrapper library to qt-ify it? What exactly do you
> want to qt-ify? Is it only the
On Wed, March 06, 2013 12:25:32 Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 11:38 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I stumbled over a bug in Qt4.8.x - QtDeclarative, but I wanted to
> > asked for opinions first.
> >
> > First of all: This is not happening in Qt5 (neither QtQuick2.0 nor QtQu
On 03/06/2013 11:38 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I stumbled over a bug in Qt4.8.x - QtDeclarative, but I wanted to
> asked for opinions first.
>
> First of all: This is not happening in Qt5 (neither QtQuick2.0 nor QtQuick
> 1.1)
>
> This seems to only happen on ARM... at least I couldn
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> This is not a warning, this is an error in C++
>
> enum Foo { A , B };
> Foo bar = 1; // error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to ‘Foo’
> int blah = bar; // No warning. unless you use enum class then it is a
> error.
>
At least, I can sec
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:00:09 AM Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11 support
> in the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this "future" would
> be Qt 5.2 at the earliest. Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 are not affected at this
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:10:04 AM Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 March 2013 11:00:09 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11
> > support
> > in the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this "future"
> >
Hi,
I think I stumbled over a bug in Qt4.8.x - QtDeclarative, but I wanted to
asked for opinions first.
First of all: This is not happening in Qt5 (neither QtQuick2.0 nor QtQuick
1.1)
This seems to only happen on ARM... at least I couldn't reproduce on any x86
machine I tried.
The ARM system
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 11:00:09 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11 support
> in the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this "future" would
> be Qt 5.2 at the earliest. Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 are not affected at this
> po
Hi,
FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11 support in
the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this "future" would be Qt
5.2 at the earliest. Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 are not affected at this point.
Simon--- Begin Message ---
Hello everyone,
Some time ago we
On Tuesday 05 March 2013 13:34:14 Alan Alpert wrote:
> I'd like to make a slight change to enum property behavior in QML.
> Currently you get a compile error if you assign an int to an enum
> property, similar to the warning you'll get in C++ if you do the same.
> However in C++ you can easily work
Hello,
This is a request for help to update/correct the new Sanity Test Guidelines
page.
Please feel free to change the page:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines
It's meant to be used for Qt releases as help for manual sanity testing (broad,
not deep).
Any help will be highly app
On 03/05/2013 10:09 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
> I've tried setting up a test server
> with two different versions of ubuntu (the documented one, and the
> latest LTS version) but neither works. This makes it impossible for me
> to help address the CI failures.
I also have some problems: I have my o
16 matches
Mail list logo
