On 24/08/13 00:24, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> On 23/08/13 12:59, Blasche Alexander wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> I am not sure whether you are aware of
>> http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qlogger
>>
>> It is pretty much what you describe. It was even close to a merge into
>> qtcore already (only rej
On 23/08/13 12:59, Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> I am not sure whether you are aware of
> http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qlogger
>
> It is pretty much what you describe. It was even close to a merge into qtcore
> already (only rejected due to feature freeze). It gives you a com
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:30:09PM +, Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>
> On 23 Aug 2013, at 1:20 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > Thoughts, flames, cookies?
>
> Yes I've been interested in doing something like that too, for debugging
> touch and other types of events. The biggest problem with events is
On sexta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2013 13:09:50, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> but what you really want is dropping the host tool build from the
> x-build and using a pre-built host build of qt instead. that is easy to
> build into configure, but hard to make useful, because the tools were
> never desi
On sexta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2013 18:48:40, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> Should I just branch dev, cherrypick the commits from my old branch and
> push to HEAD:refs/for/dev with the Change-Id's kept intact? Will this
> preserve the existing review history?
Yes. No.
Unfortunately, when you push
On 23 August 2013 17:48, Antti Kaijanmäki
wrote:
>
> Should I just branch dev, cherrypick the commits from my old branch and
> push to HEAD:refs/for/dev with the Change-Id's kept intact? Will this
> preserve the existing review history?
You can also just rebase, instead of cherry picking. If you
On 23.08.2013 17:33, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Friday 23 August 2013 14:23:23 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
>> On 23.08.2013 11:32, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>>> Stable means it does not change much.
>>
>> I was very careful not to introduce any big changes. I'm only a default
>> path and providing a fall
Are these flags needed for static linking? If yes, can we have
different sets of link flags for static and dynamic linking?
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In Debian/Ubuntu, we received some bug reports ([1], [2], [3]) stating
> that compili
On Friday 23 August 2013 14:23:23 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> On 23.08.2013 11:32, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > Stable means it does not change much.
>
> I was very careful not to introduce any big changes. I'm only a default
> path and providing a fallback in the case that the normal loading from
> t
On 8/21/13 7:14 PM, "Alan Alpert" <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Josh Faust
>wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Nils Jeisecke
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Josh Faust
>>> wrote:
>>> >I'm curious what the reasoning behind this is.
On 23 Aug 2013, at 1:20 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Thoughts, flames, cookies?
Yes I've been interested in doing something like that too, for debugging touch
and other types of events. The biggest problem with events is that they get
converted into different types and queued multiple times, wh
Hi Robin,
I am not sure whether you are aware of
http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qlogger
It is pretty much what you describe. It was even close to a merge into qtcore
already (only rejected due to feature freeze). It gives you a complete API
including ways to integrate with qDebug/qWarnin
On 23.08.2013 11:32, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Stable means it does not change much.
I was very careful not to introduce any big changes. I'm only a default
path and providing a fallback in the case that the normal loading from
theme directories fails. I'm not touching the way theme directories a
Hi,
(apologies in advance for the wall of text)
It's inevitable when working with Qt that sooner or later, you
probably have a desire to work on tracing Qt - or at least part of it.
Qt Creator's QML profiler is one such very prominent example of an
area where this may be useful, but there are man
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> 2013/8/23 Oswald Buddenhagen
> > the blackberries asked me the same question a few days ago ...
> >
> If it was on ML, I didn't spot it then - sorry.
>
it was private, otherwise my whole reply would have been a link.
it was merely m
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaw Andy
> > 3.) We had a lot of dead projects in Jira. While no project was deleted they
> > have been put into "storage". Some projects will no longer be visible and
> > others will be read-only. The assumption is that we may still want to refer
> to
> > th
On 08/23/2013 10:36 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this
> list) and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at
> this point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others
> have
> I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this
> list)
> and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at this
> point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others
> have already happened. Please note that this may temporarily
2013/8/23 Oswald Buddenhagen
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> > Let's Suppose that we have 2 different targets (ARM,MIPS) and we want
> > develop on Windows, Mac and linux 64/32 bit. If I am provider of Qt cross
> > compiled binaries for ARM and MIPS then in the
On Aug 23, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Olivier Goffart
wrote:
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,62948
>> is linked to a bug without categorization
This one went to stable because
- crash/infinite loop fix
- trivial patch for a corner case
- fix for new functionality.
I don't think we've
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia.com@qt-
> On 08/23/2013 10:36 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote:
> >
> > 2.) The QTJIRA project had a very inappropriate workflow and permission
> set.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> Let's Suppose that we have 2 different targets (ARM,MIPS) and we want
> develop on Windows, Mac and linux 64/32 bit. If I am provider of Qt cross
> compiled binaries for ARM and MIPS then in the end I can't provide complete
> developm
On 08/23/2013 10:36 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote:
>
> 2.) The QTJIRA project had a very inappropriate workflow and permission set.
> It was updated to carry the new Qt Bug workflow already. From now on it has
> the same setup as every other project. The only difference is that the
> project will
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:02:42AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 11:23:38, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> > 2. qmake doesn't use Libs.private flags
>
> Libs.private must be used when linking static libraries.
>
+only
hmm, right. but the linux linker wants -rpath-li
Hi,
I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this list)
and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at this
point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others have
already happened. Please note that this may temporarily red
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:24:01 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Friday 23. August 2013 10.04.35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffa
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:24:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > > On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaija
On Friday 23. August 2013 10.04.35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaij
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > > > On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
On 23 August 2013 09:24, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> Also i don't understand that "P1 rule for stable", what's the rationale to not
> fixing bugs in stable? That's what stable branch is for, no?
>
> I could understand "P1 rule for release", but for stable, what if i fix a
> small bug (which I und
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > > On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaij
Hi All,
I finally resolved the problem. I had Qt installed in my desktop PC
where as I just copied the installed Qt libs from desktop to laptop. And on
the qpa plugin side I had only copied minimal plugins. But for minimal
plugin to work properly It requires other installed plugins like
bearer,
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > >> I have patches (linked in the bug) to amend thi
33 matches
Mail list logo
