Re: [Development] QValidator in QtCore

2013-09-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2013 17:13:40, Matt Broadstone wrote: > Is it crazy/impossible to propose moving the QValidator class from QtGui to > QtCore? I know it was initially designed for validating widgets, however I > have a project right now (an ORM) that could very much benefit from t

Re: [Development] [QtSerialPort] Leaving from the project

2013-09-19 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 20/09/13 02:51, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Hello Denis, > > first of all thank you for your efforts, I think the serial port module is a > really nice addition to the Qt Project and would not have happened without > your initiative. +1, I was delighted to see your serial port module being integ

Re: [Development] [QtSerialPort] Leaving from the project

2013-09-19 Thread Donald Carr
Hola, I thought the chief maintainer of a module had final say over the maintenance/development of a module and was given the power to revoke power if it is impossible to collaborate with an individual. The ex-communicated individual can then fork and continue to wage a meritocratic war as necessa

[Development] QValidator in QtCore

2013-09-19 Thread Matt Broadstone
Is it crazy/impossible to propose moving the QValidator class from QtGui to QtCore? I know it was initially designed for validating widgets, however I have a project right now (an ORM) that could very much benefit from these classes. It doesn't seem that the implementation depends on QtGui at all,

Re: [Development] [QtSerialPort] Leaving from the project

2013-09-19 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hello Denis, first of all thank you for your efforts, I think the serial port module is a really nice addition to the Qt Project and would not have happened without your initiative. I'm really sad to hear of your struggles and would have hoped that we work in a more constructive way inside the

[Development] Qt Project has a hierarchy

2013-09-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello all Recent discussions have brought this to my mind. As some of you may know, I'm working on the open governance rules for a different project and I'm reusing many of what has been successful for the Qt Project. That includes its hierarchy. So this is a refresher: The Qt Project is not

Re: [Development] Proposing Allan Sandfeld Jensen as maintainer for QtWebKit

2013-09-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2013 10:30:49, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > Supported! Supporting Allan. I've known him for years and, for as long as I have, among other things he was working on, he's been doing something related to khtml or webkit. So I don't doubt his expertise. -- Thiago Mac

Re: [Development] Nominating Andrew Knight (aknight) for Approver

2013-09-19 Thread Knight Andrew
Thanks Robin, Lars, and the community for the support! I promise to wield my new powers responsibly :) Cheers, Andrew From: development-bounces+andrew.knight=digia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+andrew.knight=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf

Re: [Development] Nominating Andrew Knight (aknight) for Approver

2013-09-19 Thread Knoll Lars
Congratulations Andrew! On 19.09.13 12:48, "Robin Burchell" wrote: >And today marks weekday 15 since the proposal, with no negative >comments. I guess that means it's time to congratulate Andrew. > >Can someone please grant the necessary JIRA/Gerrit rights? Should be done now. Cheers, Lars >

Re: [Development] Nominating Andrew Knight (aknight) for Approver

2013-09-19 Thread Robin Burchell
And today marks weekday 15 since the proposal, with no negative comments. I guess that means it's time to congratulate Andrew. Can someone please grant the necessary JIRA/Gerrit rights? Thanks, Robin On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Robin Burchell wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to nominate akni

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-19 Thread Cornelius Hald
Thanks Simon! I was thinking/hoping that with the announced move from Webkit to Chromium there would already be a solid plan on how to support the mobile platforms. Now that I know there isn't, I'll practice more patience and/or look again into wrapping the native WebView. Cheers, Conny On Thu,

Re: [Development] Proposing Allan Sandfeld Jensen as maintainer for QtWebKit

2013-09-19 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
Supported! On 9/19/13 10:10 , Simon Hausmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stepping down as maintainer of QtWebKit in the Qt project and I would like > to propose Allan as new maintainer. > > He's a veteran with many years of development and maintenance experience from > KDE, khtml and Qt. He's also the gu

[Development] Proposing Allan Sandfeld Jensen as maintainer for QtWebKit

2013-09-19 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, I'm stepping down as maintainer of QtWebKit in the Qt project and I would like to propose Allan as new maintainer. He's a veteran with many years of development and maintenance experience from KDE, khtml and Qt. He's also the guy responsible for the QtWebKit 2.3 release for Qt 4.8 - a very

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-19 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Thursday 19. September 2013 09.29.47 Cornelius Hald wrote: > Sorry to bother again, but what's the plan now regarding QQuick2 WebView > on Android? Is it Webkit? Chromium/Blink? Nothing? Something else? And > when? The initial release of Qt for Android is not going to include any integration o

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-19 Thread Cornelius Hald
Sorry to bother again, but what's the plan now regarding QQuick2 WebView on Android? Is it Webkit? Chromium/Blink? Nothing? Something else? And when? Thanks! Conny On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 17:06 +0200, Cornelius Hald wrote: > Hi, > > the FAQ states: "We intend to make QtWebEngine available on all