A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
the project likes the idea we can get a legal check and then fix up the
infrastructure to follow (sanity bot and license-check test).
Current rule is roug
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:31:30PM +0200, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In grantlee there is a example called htmlapps, which creates a QNetworkReply
> subclass to render a template.
>
>
> https://gitorious.org/grantlee/grantlee/source/master:examples/htmlapps/templatereply.cpp
> 24d711
Hi,
I'm running into a strange error related to context properties in qml.
Basically, I'm trying to expose a QQmlPropertyMap into the context of my
QQmlApplicationEngine, and within the qml set up a "recursive" binding so
that changes to that map from C++ are expressed in qml, and vica versa.
This
On sexta-feira, 20 de setembro de 2013 10:52:40, André Somers wrote:
> Reading through that discussion, I wonder why the choice made has been
> to depricate QtAlgorithms, while in that thread it was suggested to
> depricate QT_NO_STL itself. Personally, I'm sad to see them go, but I
> understand
Hello,
In grantlee there is a example called htmlapps, which creates a QNetworkReply
subclass to render a template.
https://gitorious.org/grantlee/grantlee/source/master:examples/htmlapps/templatereply.cpp
24d711fc3ac88565a59c45fb6fb2dd1e75a7a9f2
This works with Qt 4.7, but the QWebView displ
> -Original Message-
> From: Koehne Kai
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:07 PM
> To: Koehne Kai; Blasche Alexander; Robin Burchell; development@qt-
> project.org
> Cc: Poenitz Andre
> Subject: Qt Category Logging Patch - please review
>
> Hi,
>
> This is just a heads up that https:/
On Friday 20. September 2013 12.42.28 Denis Shienkov wrote:
[...]
> Thus, I changed the mind and made the decision to remain and continue to
> keep the project. So - do not worry! :)
Yay, welcome back :)
Simon
___
Development mailing list
Development@q
Op 13-9-2013 22:16, Giuseppe D'Angelo schreef:
> Hello,
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43441 (currently waiting for
> a review) is going to mark most of the QtAlgorithms functions as
> deprecated.
>
> The decision about this has already happened some time ago:
> http://www.mail-arc
Hi all,
I feel a bit sorry about the email I sent out the other day. I was a bit
overheated, and I think this email content was a bit of exaggeration for the
real problems at hand. It is true that there were some pending changes for a
while (4-5 out of the 200-300 or more?), but rethinking it with
Howdy,
Il 13/09/2013 22:16, Giuseppe D'Angelo ha scritto:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43441 (currently waiting for a
review)
And still waiting. Can anyone please go ahead and push some button?
Thanks,
--
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2013! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Giuseppe D'A
Hello Denis.
That was sad to hear.
If he is always busy, (I know this might be subjective from your POV) then I'm
not sure if it was the right decision for you to leave. If he's always busy,
who will drive the project forward now? Did you discuss this with other
contributors of the project? If o
11 matches
Mail list logo
