Re: [Development] Proposal for UseSheet in QFileDialog option

2013-10-21 Thread Ziller Eike
On 18.10.2013, at 21:56, Yuë Liu opusp...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In QFileDialog documentation it says QFileDialog::DontUseSheet is no longer supported and user should use QFileDialog::open() if they want to use sheets, but for many simple application static methods are enough and

Re: [Development] Puzzled by desktop development priorities, Mac OS specifically [Warning: Rant]

2013-10-21 Thread Ziller Eike
On 20.10.2013, at 21:34, qtnext qtn...@gmail.com wrote: I use now Qt5.1.1, try to erase all Qt4 lib in my mac .. And I have always the same trouble. When I start macdeploy with verbose=2, I have the following error : ERROR: no file at

Re: [Development] Codifying the .qml License Header Exemption

2013-10-21 Thread Mitch Curtis
On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote: A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if the project likes the idea we can get a legal check and then fix up the infrastructure to follow (sanity

[Development] Is this QML parser behaviour correct?

2013-10-21 Thread Martin Smith
The QML parser has callbacks for processing the Import list and for processing individual imports. In qdoc, I used the one that gets the entire import list: virtual bool visit(UiImportList *) { return true; } virtual bool visit(UiImport *) { return true; } I assumed it would bet called once,

[Development] Recover from a bad rebase (incorrect squash)

2013-10-21 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
Hi All, Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits incorrectly. Situation before rebase was: (oldest) A - B - C - D (newest) I wanted to squash B D together so during interactive rebase, I chose 'squash' options for B D (wrongly assuming that these 2 would get

Re: [Development] Recover from a bad rebase (incorrect squash)

2013-10-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Mandeep Sandhu Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:50 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Recover from a

Re: [Development] Recover from a bad rebase (incorrect squash)

2013-10-21 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
Hi All, Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits incorrectly. Use 'git reflog' to get the HEAD of the commit before the squash, and use git reset to restore it. Thanks Kai! That fixed it! -mandeep Regards Kai

Re: [Development] Is this QML parser behaviour correct?

2013-10-21 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Monday 21. October 2013 13.33.43 Martin Smith wrote: The QML parser has callbacks for processing the Import list and for processing individual imports. In qdoc, I used the one that gets the entire import list: virtual bool visit(UiImportList *) { return true; } virtual bool

Re: [Development] Recover from a bad rebase (incorrect squash)

2013-10-21 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
21.10.2013, 16:06, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:  Hi All,  Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits  incorrectly.  Use 'git reflog' to get the HEAD of the commit before the squash, and use git reset to restore it. Thanks Kai! That fixed it!

Re: [Development] object_script files remain after make distclean

2013-10-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 03:50:29PM +0800, cat fa wrote: Hi everyone, object_script files are generated due to the reason discussed in http://www.qtcentre.org/archive/index.php/t-6002.html . When excuting make distclean, all Makefiles are removed except object_script files. I think

[Development] Question on Gerrit workflow

2013-10-21 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
Hi All, I have a newbie question on our Gerrit workflow. Suppose a change I'm working on is split across 3 commits. Each commit implements a part of the functionality of the change. Once I get approval for a particular changeset, should I merge it to staging immediately or wait for approval for

Re: [Development] Question on Gerrit workflow

2013-10-21 Thread Blasche Alexander
Hi, Whether you merge immediately or later all 3 changes at the same time is really up to you. If you do merge individually then you have to rebase your branch once the first change was merged (git pull --rebase origin dev). Once you have rebased git will not attempt to push the already

Re: [Development] Question on Gerrit workflow

2013-10-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:33:14PM +0530, Mandeep Sandhu wrote: How do I handle this? git pull --rebase ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Removing libudev dependency from binary packages?

2013-10-21 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi there, In the latest Linux binary packages for 5.2 libQt5Webkit depends on libudev.so.0, which isn't installed (or at least not in this version) on a lot of distributions: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34176 The easiest fix would be to configure Qt with -no-libudev /

Re: [Development] gerrit: relevant reviewers for signals bugfix in QTextCursor

2013-10-21 Thread Graham Coleman
Thanks for the quick feedback, this review is closed. I will test in qt5 and perhaps submit a followup patch. Graham On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Graham Coleman ravel...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'm awaiting reviews for my first submission, a small bugfix I proposed on JIRA, but do

Re: [Development] Removing libudev dependency from binary packages?

2013-10-21 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi Kai, I can say only about the QtSerialPort. The QtSerialPort module is used the libudev ((more precisely - the libudev devel is required !!!) as preferred way (for the QSerialPortInfo class) to detect a names and other info about present serial ports. The support of libudev will detected

Re: [Development] Removing libudev dependency from binary packages?

2013-10-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 14:29:27, Koehne Kai wrote: Hi there, In the latest Linux binary packages for 5.2 libQt5Webkit depends on libudev.so.0, which isn't installed (or at least not in this version) on a lot of distributions:

Re: [Development] Codifying the .qml License Header Exemption

2013-10-21 Thread Alan Alpert
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Mitch Curtis mitch.cur...@digia.com wrote: On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote: A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if the project likes the idea we

Re: [Development] Removing libudev dependency from binary packages?

2013-10-21 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-10-21, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: But what distributions are those that don't have libudev.so.0? Most modern ones I think. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/hotplug/udev.git/tree/Makefile.am Note that udev in general is built from systemd source tree, even for

Re: [Development] Removing libudev dependency from binary packages?

2013-10-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 23:07:25, Thiago Macieira wrote: - libqgtk2: fix, it doesn't need libudev The fix for libqgtk2 can probably be: linux: QMAKE_LFLAGS += -Wl,--as-needed Can anyone check if the other plugins linking to QtPlatformSupport also have the udev dependency?